GenHTTP Roadmap #567
Kaliumhexacyanoferrat
started this conversation in
Polls
GenHTTP Roadmap
#567
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
|
Really pleased to have found your project. We've an app using Nancy which runs on Web / Mac / Windows. With Nancy not supported for a while, your project seems really well positioned to fill the gap. A recently updated, maintained, lightweight no-fuss web server. For this use case, ASP.NET Core + Kestrel being bundled into our apps doesn't seem easy/appealing. Looking forward to taking it for a spin. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
|
Glad to hear 😊 Please let me know if you encounter any issues (especially on macOS) or have feedback on the developer experience 😉 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
With GenHTTP 9 the focus of the project has shifted to API development (in contrast to a general purpose web server) with accompanying features such as Websockets or automatically generated Open API definitions.
With this poll I would like to receive some input on the roadmap of the project - so what do you think is currently missing or could be improved when it comes to API development with GenHTTP.
6 votes ·
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions