Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

reg_aladin v1.3.9 and v1.5.58 discrepancy #35

Open
mmodat opened this issue May 21, 2018 · 2 comments
Open

reg_aladin v1.3.9 and v1.5.58 discrepancy #35

mmodat opened this issue May 21, 2018 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@mmodat
Copy link
Contributor

mmodat commented May 21, 2018

In gitlab by @rmharbr on Apr 17, 2018, 16:34

Using the executable reg_aladin, I notice a large discrepancy between v1.3.9 & v.1.5.58 (most recent pull) in the registration of some head images. As I'm dealing with head images, I'm using the -rigOnly flag.

I'm experiencing this problem for multiple PET frames (longitudinal), as well as multimodal registration between an MR and PET image.

Strangely, v1.3.9 seems to perform the registration correctly (the output image is nicely superposed on the reference image in Slicer). With v1.5.58, although the output image moves closer to the reference image, it is still poorly aligned. The required rigid transformation is largely a translation in the z-direction, so it is easy to qualitatively say which one is better.

Is there anything I'm missing when upgrading the version of NiftyReg? I know that by default symmetric aladin is now used, but whether I use symmetric or non-symmetric, the old version seems to give better results.

@mmodat
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmodat commented May 21, 2018

In gitlab by @rmharbr on Apr 17, 2018, 16:41

changed title from reg_aladin v1.3.9 and v1.5 discrepancy to reg_aladin v1.3.9 and v1.5{+.58+} discrepancy

@mmodat
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmodat commented May 21, 2018

In gitlab by @rmharbr on Apr 17, 2018, 16:41

changed the description

@mmodat mmodat self-assigned this Jul 14, 2022
@ericspod ericspod added the bug Something isn't working label Apr 3, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
Status: No status
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants