Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Error in blist testing instructions in DG #3

Open
JodyLorah opened this issue Apr 16, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Error in blist testing instructions in DG #3

JodyLorah opened this issue Apr 16, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@JodyLorah
Copy link
Owner

JodyLorah commented Apr 16, 2021

When I follow the DG to try inputting ... , I get an error that is not "similar to previous" as what the DG stated.

image.png

@nus-pe-bot
Copy link

nus-pe-bot commented Apr 20, 2021

Team's Response

Logically, it should be clear that ... means any other incorrect blacklist command, and not an input of ....

Additionally, in the case of an actual input of ..., the outcome of the command is still consistent with the previous expected outcome of
No contact is edited. Error details are shown in the status message..

Items for the Tester to Verify

❓ Issue response

Team chose [response.Rejected]

  • I disagree

Reason for disagreement: Here is again another instance of an unstandardised usage of ... without explanation of what it is. Your team has 3 different explanations and usages of the ... on top of the commonly known usage of ellipsis in the English Language and assume that the user is "clear" on what your implementation is. The user does not live in your heads, so how would they know what you are trying to say. 3 usages in 2 documents, don't you think that's a little too many variations, especially since you did not state what each ... does and just leave it to the wild imagination of the user.

For your second point, it does not show that error message you stated if you just key in ... and nothing else.


Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants