You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Matching charged tracks to the start counter in the very forward region between 96 and 98cm shows a strong paddle (=phi) dependence, e.g. for run 72180 (Spring 2020):
After the start counter was reinstalled in 2022, this phi dependence is offset by 8 paddles, which matches the change in the geometry file of 96 degrees exactly. See for example run 120365 (Spring 2023):
This strong dependence in phi is not reproduced in any MC sample (example from 2017):
I submit the issue here to collect more information about this effect, whether it is caused by an incorrect description of the start counter in the geometry or a calibration or hardware issue. I don't necessarily believe there is a mistake in the reconstruction.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
There is a clear phi dependence of the Delta phi variable, which is used to match start counter hits to extrapolated tracks. This plot is only filled for tracks that project on the start counter with z > 96cm:
I repeated the analysis for run 72180 (2019-11) with the updated geometry. The matching in the forward region of the SC looks uniform now.
Unfortunately, this impressive improvement cannot be seen for run 120365 (2023-01):
As the start counter was rotated in between these two runs, the geometry likely has to be changed.
Matching charged tracks to the start counter in the very forward region between 96 and 98cm shows a strong paddle (=phi) dependence, e.g. for run 72180 (Spring 2020):
After the start counter was reinstalled in 2022, this phi dependence is offset by 8 paddles, which matches the change in the geometry file of 96 degrees exactly. See for example run 120365 (Spring 2023):
This strong dependence in phi is not reproduced in any MC sample (example from 2017):
I submit the issue here to collect more information about this effect, whether it is caused by an incorrect description of the start counter in the geometry or a calibration or hardware issue. I don't necessarily believe there is a mistake in the reconstruction.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: