You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Dcat supports a title and description property on distribution level. Since I need to represent (map) from DCAT to IDS I was looking for those props on representation or artifact level.
It seems that IDS does not foresee a title and description field on artifacts and representation? If that is right, I would suggest to consider this, since mapping from DCAT seems to be common requirement, at least in MDP it is.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Just saw that representation is a subclass of dcat:distribution. According to the DCAT spec title and description are formally already part of the ids:representation but according to my knowledge, they are not part of the generated Java classes.
Added the suggested changes (add title and description) to the ids:Representation class in #483.
The IDS Information Model splits the dcat:Distribution into the ids:Representation and ids:Artifact. Therefore, it is not necessary to add title / description information to an artifact.
As part of the next major version, we might also consider to align with dcat --> merge ids:Artifact & Representation.
But this is still open to discussion.
Also related: #481
Dcat supports a title and description property on distribution level. Since I need to represent (map) from DCAT to IDS I was looking for those props on representation or artifact level.
It seems that IDS does not foresee a title and description field on artifacts and representation? If that is right, I would suggest to consider this, since mapping from DCAT seems to be common requirement, at least in MDP it is.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: