You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi. How should we interpret the delta position scores for a deletion?
eg. for a 6nt deletion : Variant 17:81668137 GTAGCGA > G with output 0.16|0.03|0.01|0.01|7|1|706|1891
I understand for encoding deletions in the input vcf we need POS to be the genomic coordinate of the nucleotide that remains after the deletion (in this case G). So the deletion technically starts at genomic position 81668137+1=81668138 (POS +1 for positive strand).
Should we +/- the delta position score from POS or the actual deletion start position?
Either way, this raises an issue, evidenced by this example and many others I see genome wide. A delta position score of 1 means the predicted location of splicing changes is 81668137 +1 (or 81668138 + 1 pending above query being solved) which = 81668138. This genomic position, if using the wild type sequence as reference, is actually deleted in a 6nt deletion. I do not understand how any delta position score for a deletion of size 6 could be <6? This gene is on the positive strand, so I understand how -1 would be possible, though this happens on genes on both strands.
Should we be using the variant sequence as the reference or the WT? If the variant, are the genomic positions essentially "shuffled" by 6 nucleotides in this example, meaning +1 delta position score points to predicted location of splicing changes as the first nucelotide after the deletion? That was all I could think of to explain this, and your examples only include substitutions. Again, I see this many times, for position scores corresponding to all four categories and for deletions of varying size.
This is important in my case specifically as i am trying to extract the sequence for the predicted location of splicing changes. Thank you for your help.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi. How should we interpret the delta position scores for a deletion?
eg. for a 6nt deletion : Variant 17:81668137 GTAGCGA > G with output 0.16|0.03|0.01|0.01|7|1|706|1891
I understand for encoding deletions in the input vcf we need POS to be the genomic coordinate of the nucleotide that remains after the deletion (in this case G). So the deletion technically starts at genomic position 81668137+1=81668138 (POS +1 for positive strand).
Should we +/- the delta position score from POS or the actual deletion start position?
Either way, this raises an issue, evidenced by this example and many others I see genome wide. A delta position score of 1 means the predicted location of splicing changes is 81668137 +1 (or 81668138 + 1 pending above query being solved) which = 81668138. This genomic position, if using the wild type sequence as reference, is actually deleted in a 6nt deletion. I do not understand how any delta position score for a deletion of size 6 could be <6? This gene is on the positive strand, so I understand how -1 would be possible, though this happens on genes on both strands.
Should we be using the variant sequence as the reference or the WT? If the variant, are the genomic positions essentially "shuffled" by 6 nucleotides in this example, meaning +1 delta position score points to predicted location of splicing changes as the first nucelotide after the deletion? That was all I could think of to explain this, and your examples only include substitutions. Again, I see this many times, for position scores corresponding to all four categories and for deletions of varying size.
This is important in my case specifically as i am trying to extract the sequence for the predicted location of splicing changes. Thank you for your help.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: