You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Current IMA mapping assigns classifications of "artwork" for all records + IMA thesaurus terms based on PhyMediaCategory_tab. This is incorrect. Only artworks should be considered artworks (e.g., design collection and similar artifacts should not receive this type.
Solution: use TitObjectType for major categories (e.g., "Visual Works: Paintings"). Where there is not a clear mapping to our Record Types, a broad AAT category won't be available, just the IMA thesaurus term.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Per the standard list of vocabulary terms to me used in LA, there are established categories of artworks and other Human-Made_Objects that are recommended for use.
Current IMA mapping assigns classifications of "artwork" for all records + IMA thesaurus terms based on PhyMediaCategory_tab. This is incorrect. Only artworks should be considered artworks (e.g., design collection and similar artifacts should not receive this type.
Solution: use TitObjectType for major categories (e.g., "Visual Works: Paintings"). Where there is not a clear mapping to our Record Types, a broad AAT category won't be available, just the IMA thesaurus term.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: