Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Security upgrade requests from 2.20.0 to 2.32.0 #114

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

rhiananthony
Copy link

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


Snyk has created this PR to fix one or more vulnerable packages in the `pip` dependencies of this project.

Changes included in this PR

  • Changes to the following files to upgrade the vulnerable dependencies to a fixed version:
    • requirements.txt
⚠️ Warning
s3transfer 0.8.2 has requirement botocore<2.0a.0,>=1.33.2, but you have botocore 1.12.208.
PyGithub 2.3.0 has requirement urllib3>=1.26.0, but you have urllib3 1.25.11.
hca 6.5.1 has requirement jsonschema<3,>=2.6, but you have jsonschema 4.17.3.
hca 6.5.1 has requirement dcplib<3,>=2.0.2, but you have dcplib 3.12.0.
google-auth-oauthlib 1.2.0 has requirement google-auth>=2.15.0, but you have google-auth 1.35.0.
google-api-core 2.19.0 has requirement google-auth<3.0.dev0,>=2.14.1, but you have google-auth 1.35.0.
Flask 2.2.5 has requirement Jinja2>=3.0, but you have Jinja2 2.11.3.
dcplib 3.12.0 has requirement termcolor<2,>=1.1.0, but you have termcolor 2.3.0.
botocore 1.12.208 has requirement jmespath<1.0.0,>=0.7.1, but you have jmespath 1.0.1.
boto3 1.33.13 has requirement botocore<1.34.0,>=1.33.13, but you have botocore 1.12.208.
argcomplete 1.12.3 has requirement importlib-metadata<5,>=0.23; python_version == "3.7", but you have importlib-metadata 6.7.0.

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed

By pinning:
Severity Priority Score (*) Issue Breaking Change Exploit Maturity
medium severity 566/1000
Why? Recently disclosed, Has a fix available, CVSS 5.6
Always-Incorrect Control Flow Implementation
SNYK-PYTHON-REQUESTS-6928867
No No Known Exploit

(*) Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.

Some vulnerabilities couldn't be fully fixed and so Snyk will still find them when the project is tested again. This may be because the vulnerability existed within more than one direct dependency, but not all of the affected dependencies could be upgraded.

Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust project settings

📚 Read more about Snyk's upgrade and patch logic


Note: This is a default PR template raised by Snyk. Find out more about how you can customise Snyk PRs in our documentation.

Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Learn about vulnerability in an interactive lesson of Snyk Learn.

The following vulnerabilities are fixed by pinning transitive dependencies:
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-PYTHON-REQUESTS-6928867
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants