Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

core.sangnom.SangNomMod(..) vs core.sangnom.SangNom(..) #5

Open
Selur opened this issue Aug 27, 2020 · 3 comments
Open

core.sangnom.SangNomMod(..) vs core.sangnom.SangNom(..) #5

Selur opened this issue Aug 27, 2020 · 3 comments

Comments

@Selur
Copy link

Selur commented Aug 27, 2020

Would be nice if SangNomMod could use 'core.sangnommod.SangNomMod(..)'
otherwise when having both the sangnom and the sangnommod library inside the autoload folder of Vapoursynth, one get's something like:

vapoursynth.Error: Plugin load of /Library/Frameworks/VapourSynth.framework/lib/vapoursynth/libsangnom.dylib failed, namespace sangnom already populated by /Library/Frameworks/VapourSynth.framework/lib/vapoursynth/libsangnommod.dylib
@theChaosCoder
Copy link

theChaosCoder commented Aug 28, 2020

+1
But is there any reason to use this plugin at all if there is a much better alternative?

@Selur
Copy link
Author

Selur commented Sep 4, 2020

some scripts use it :)

@sl1pkn07
Copy link
Contributor

ping(?)

greetings

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants