Replies: 3 comments
-
Perhaps architected as multiple Mapper instances, all of which can feed mapping rules into/ingest mapping rules from a central repo. Rules format (a trimmed-down version of the existing JSON?) would need clarifying, as well as permissions on the central system, and whether it's an add-on to a central Mapper instance or a stand-alone tool. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I've moved this to a discussion - as it needs wider thought, design, and planning. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
This feels especially important to support governance, and distributed compute. The absolute minimum version of it is to enable importing Both of these might be enough - but will probably end up with manual rules management hell. The level above that is having a central repository (a standalone API), where Carrot instances can push/pull rules from. Several things would help with this:
A central repository would not be much work itself (a database, with permissions, a limited set of endpoints). An integration with Carrot would be more work, but eased if the above were in place. We would make the assumption that there can be many Carrots attaching to many hubs. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Can we have a carrot mapper that is installed within an organisation infra, but can still benefit from mapping rules from the central system
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions