Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Some pointers on what to do with the icons #74

Open
9 tasks
GijsTimmers opened this issue Mar 6, 2015 · 10 comments
Open
9 tasks

Some pointers on what to do with the icons #74

GijsTimmers opened this issue Mar 6, 2015 · 10 comments

Comments

@GijsTimmers
Copy link
Owner

Sam has recently sent us a preview of the icon set for kotnetcli. Jo and I think that it looks great. We need to make a list of preferred icons, so that Sam has a good idea where his efforts are most needed.

Feel free to edit this list at any time.

We should have:

  • A banner for README.md
  • A normal computer application icon in SVG format. We will be using this tool to generate app icons from it.
  • A monochrome ('black-white-gray') icon for Unity' and Gnome's top bar, able to show connection status:
    • Disconnected
    • Connecting
    • Connected
  • A Windows traybar icon: low-priority
  • A Mac traybar icon: maybe this can be just the same as the monochrome Unity/Gnome icon. As we don't own a Mac, we don't know if this looks good or not.
  • An app icon for Android. Low-priority, as we can always use https://romannurik.github.io/AndroidAssetStudio/icons-launcher.html

For the 'Connecting' icon: it would be nice if the two K's in the monochrome icon could alternatingly switch from black to white indicate that kotnetcli is trying to connect. As soon as the connection is succesful, stop switching colour and have the front K in the colour black, and the back K in the colour white. We are not sure on how to indicate the 'Disconnected' status: maybe have two black K's? Or two grey K's? Feel free to put in some thoughts here.

@jovanbulck
Copy link
Collaborator

thx @samgielis

@jovanbulck
Copy link
Collaborator

Note on the monochrome icon: we can't use pure black (at least in Gnome) as the background is black; the icon should use white and (a single tint of) gray, as shown in the screenshot below

screenshot_gnome3

@GijsTimmers
Copy link
Owner Author

Good catch!

@samgielis
Copy link

consider all of this done - in the next week(s) or so :)

@GijsTimmers
Copy link
Owner Author

You're the best!

@GijsTimmers
Copy link
Owner Author

@samgielis do you mind if I use the currently available icons for kotnetcli Android app development? I received the 1000x1000 icon and banner by email from Jo. Of course, I will mention your name and Github page in the About section.

@samgielis
Copy link

@GijsTimmers no, by all means, use them! Sorry I never got to creating those icons. Do you have them covered or could you still use some help?

@GijsTimmers
Copy link
Owner Author

Thank you. The stuff we have right now will do for a while.

@jovanbulck
Copy link
Collaborator

I created an ascii version of the iconic double key - for kotnetcli should not forget its roots as a command line application. Inspired by pacman --version, I figured we could display the ascii logo on the left when invoking kotnetcli --version. Here we go:

jo@Giedion[0]::~$ cat ~/Desktop/kotnetcli_ascii_logo.txt 
   __
 __\ \                 kotnetcli v1.3.0-dev
 \ \\_\___             Copyright (C) 2014-2016 Kotnetcli Development Team
  \   V  / __          (https://github.com/GijsTimmers/kotnetcli)
   \  `\<</ /
    \  _\_\<<          This program may be freely redistributed under
     \_\ `_\_\         the terms of the GNU General Public License.
        \_\

jo@Giedion[0]::~$ 

Looks better in a fixed-width white-on-black terminal imo:

kotnetcli_ascii_terminal

I'll open a pull request for this, once the GPL re-licensing #98 is completed.

@GijsTimmers
Copy link
Owner Author

That's so awesome and so linuxy! thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants