-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 280
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Performance : don't wait for tile persistence to send tile to request initiator #1200
Comments
Oh, this has been on my want-list for years now. Yes. Just find someone with time to code it. |
Isn't it enough to call the method on this line asynchronously ? |
For the simple non meta-tiling case, the lock must be released once the file is written on disk, so that other threads find it and avoid computation. But the meta-tiling case needs to be taken care of as well, and that's more complicated, we might need two levels of locks, one for the meta-tile (block until computed), and one for each single tile (block until saved), with the single tile one released asynchronously. |
This PR does exactly what's requested here (among other things), but it's targeting the GeoServer integration case only. Some of the same code could be made more general and ported over to standalone GWC, eventually. |
Hi Andrea. Thank you for the update. |
That PR has been merged. However, it only affects a GWC embedded in GeoServer, not a stand-alone GWC talking to a WMS server via HTTP. Is that enough for you @AlexGacon ? |
Hi Andrea. I will see with Gabriel if it is enough for the GS Cloud case I have in mind. |
Hi,
Would-it be possible to add an option in geowebcache to have the tile persistence done asynchronously from the reply of the request. Like this, the caller can directly have the tile without waiting for the storage, if the storage has performance issues.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: