-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
TrustGraph integration #94
Comments
doesn't it only go to 7 degrees of separation haha love the idea of word clouds.. I think its good to create a matrix of tags for each "topic" instead of trying to find an umbrella term, so that topics dont converge on a single idea but allow for multiple meanings linked to components of concepts/categories |
Thanks @mattyg for writing this up! Great summary. |
@mattyg FYI we're treating the “description” field as a bit of a wiki to ideate on the features and implementation details. |
@jost-s and I did a pass on design and implementation of relevant features -- notes integrated into Description field above. |
I like it. Anything helpful we can contribute, or just an FYI? |
Thanks for asking @bierlingm -- feedback and ideas or concerns welcome at this stage. I also made a more tightly scoped description of the initial PR here: #104 |
We decided to remove the native "follow" feature entirely and instead just use trust graph for follows.
|
Some more thoughts from our meeting today about trust graph UX:
I definitely understand if this doesn't happen in the first pass of trustgraph integration, but if so let's make another ticket for it. |
Another idea from our meeting today:
|
Reflection from meeting today:
|
Originally by @mattyg , Collab edited by @harlantwood, @dauphin3, @jost-s --
@harlantwood & @dauphin3 are working on integrating TrustGraph 🎉 in #104
Collecting thoughts -- about the initial integration and beyond -- in one place.
Overview
Following
[Hard Pass]---[Meh]---[Awesome]
which mirrors the underlying scale:-1.0 to 0 to 1.0
.Feed
Topics
Implementation
include_trust_atoms
argumentThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: