Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Acetaldehyde has duplicate recipes in LCR #17354

Closed
2 of 3 tasks
FireWarrior2 opened this issue Sep 15, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed
2 of 3 tasks

Acetaldehyde has duplicate recipes in LCR #17354

FireWarrior2 opened this issue Sep 15, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
Bug: Minor Status: Triage Issue awaiting triage. Remove once this issue is processed

Comments

@FireWarrior2
Copy link

Your GTNH Discord Username

fire.warrior

Your Pack Version

2.6.1

Your Server

SP

Java Version

Java 8

Type of Server

Single Player

Your Expectation

Acetaldehyde has one recipe in LCR.

The Reality

Acetaldehyde has duplicate recipes in LCR: with 4 and 5 circuits and same input fluids:
2024-09-15_14 57 33

Your Proposal

Delete one of recipes.

Final Checklist

  • I have searched this issue tracker and there is nothing similar already. Posting on a closed issue saying the bug still exists will prompt us to investigate and reopen it once we confirm your report.
  • I can reproduce this problem consistently by follow the exact steps I described above, or this does not need reproducing, e.g. recipe loophole.
  • I have asked other people and they confirm they also have this problem by follow the exact steps I described above, or this does not need reproducing, e.g. recipe loophole.
@FireWarrior2 FireWarrior2 added Status: Triage Issue awaiting triage. Remove once this issue is processed Bug: Minor labels Sep 15, 2024
@BlueHero233
Copy link
Member

Should be fixed in 2.7
2024-10-10_20 38 25

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Bug: Minor Status: Triage Issue awaiting triage. Remove once this issue is processed
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants