We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
displayName
Classification
Remove need to combine classification.level and classification.group when classification.displayName is all that is needed in some cases.
classification.level
classification.group
classification.displayName
Add displayName accessor from Classification model to schema.graphql for use in queries for frontend. Add displayName to queries where needed.
schema.graphql
type Classification { displayName: String! }
map
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Depending on how you feel about ternaries...
Both languages have idiomatic ways of left padding strings:
Sorry, something went wrong.
Depending on how you feel about ternaries... Both languages have idiomatic ways of left padding strings
Both languages have idiomatic ways of left padding strings
That does look cleaner for sure
No branches or pull requests
♻️ Refactor
Remove need to combine
classification.level
andclassification.group
whenclassification.displayName
is all that is needed in some cases.Example
🙋♀️ Proposed Solution
Add
displayName
accessor fromClassification
model toschema.graphql
for use in queries for frontend. AdddisplayName
to queries where needed.✅ Acceptance Criteria
classification.level
andclassification.group
whenclassification.displayName
is what is neededmap
to combine group and levelThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: