forked from IUCompilerCourse/Essentials-of-Compilation
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
dataflow-notes.txt
258 lines (203 loc) · 6.9 KB
/
dataflow-notes.txt
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
Liveness Analysis as a Dataflow Analysis
----------------------------------------
References:
* Principles of Program Analysis by Nielson, Nielson, and Hankin
* Ch. 9 of Compilers: Principles, Techniques, & Tools
by Aho, Lam, Sethi, Ullman
* Ch. 17 of Modern Compiler Implemenation in ML by Appel
Running example:
S* =
[y := 1]^1
while [x>0]^2
[w := y]^3
[x := x - 1]^4
[z := w]^5
We're going to work on the control flow graph of the program,
where each superscript corresponds to a node in the graph
and the edges represent control flow possibilities.
Recall that a variable is *live* if it might get used later.
Used for register allocation and dead code elimination.
A backward analysis.
gen([x:=e]) = FV(e)
gen([skip]) = {}
gen([e]) = FV(e)
kill([x:=e]) = {x}
kill([skip]) = {}
kill([e]) = {}
Let P[l] be the statement number l in program P.
LV_before(l) = (LV_after(l) - kill(P[l])) U gen(P[l]) (1)
LV_after(l) = Union{ LV_before(l') | l --> l' in CFG(P) } (2)
We'd like to find a solution to these equations.
It's useful to combine all these equations into a single
equation by putting all the LV's into two vectors:
LV_before = [LV_before(1), LV_before(2), ... ]
LV_after = [LV_after(1), LV_after(2), ... ]
And then encode the equations (1) and (2) for all the statements
into two vector-valued functions F_before and F_after.
F_before(l)(LV_after) = (LV_after[l] - kill(P[l])) U gen(P[l])
F_after(l)(LV_before) = Union{ LV_before[l'] | l --> l' in CFG(P) }
We could even squish these two vectors (before/after) and two
functions into a single vector LV and function F. Then a solution
looks like:
LV = F(LV)
That is, we'd like to find a fixed point of F.
There's a branch of mathematics that studies fixed points
in the context of lattices.
The sets of variables ordered by subseteq form a lattice,
with {} as the bottom element and the set of all variables V
as the top element.
Vectors of sets ordered pointwise forms a lattice, with
[{},{},{},...] as the bottom element and
[V,V,V,...] as the top element.
One of the classic fixpoint theorems is:
Suppose F is an order-preserving function. If the set L
has no infinitely ascending chains and a least element bot,
then there is a fixed point of F.
Proof.
bot <= F(bot) because bot is the least element of L
F(bot) <= F(F(bot)) because F is order preserving.
and so on, so in general we have
F^i(bot) <= F^i+1(bot)
but this can't go on forever, so at some point
F^n(bot) = F^n+1(bot)
and therefore, F^n(bot) is a fixed point of F.
But is our F for liveness order-preserving? (skip this)
Suppose V <= V'.
Let l be any statement number.
If l is even: (LV_before)
We have V[l] <= V'[l].
then V[l] - kill(P[l]) <= V[l]' - kill(P[l])
and (V[l] - kill(P[l])) U gen(P[l]) <= (V[l]' - kill(P[l])) U gen(P[l]).
Therefore F_l(V) <= F_l(V').
If l is odd: (LV_after)
We have V[i] <= V'[i] for any i.
Thus,
Union{ V[l'] | l --> l' in CFG(P) }
<= Union{ V'[l'] | l --> l' in CFG(P) }
Therefore F_l(V) <= F_l(V')
So F(V) <= F(V).
Do we have a least element? Yes:
[{}, {}, ...]
Are there infinite ascending chains? No, because there are
a finite number of variables in the program.
Worklist algorithm (applied to Liveness)
W is a list of control-flow edges
1. Initialization
W = []
for (l,l') in CFG
W = [(l,l')] + W
for l in CFG do
Analysis[l] = {}
2. Iteration
while W != []:
(l,l') = W[0]
W = W[1:]
if F_l(Analysis[l]) not <= Analysis[l']:
Analysis[l'] := Analysis[l'] |_| F_l(Analysis[l])
for l'' in in_edges(CFG, l'):
W = [(l'',l')] + W
3. Recording the result
LV_after(l) := Analysis[l]
LV_before(l) := F_l(Analysis[l])
Example
S* =
[y := 1]^1
while [x>0]^2
[w := y]^3
[x := x - 1]^4
[z := w]^5
flow^R(S*) = (2,1),(3,2),(4,3),(2,4),(5,2)
F_before_1(X) = X - {y}
F_before_2(X) = X U {x}
F_before_3(X) = (X - {w}) U {y}
F_before_4(X) = X U {x}
F_before_5(X) = (X - {z}) U {w}
Analysis W
step 1 2 3 4 5
1 {} {} {} {} {} (2,1),(3,2),(4,3),(2,4),(5,2)
2 {x} {} {} {} {} (3,2),(4,3),(2,4),(5,2)
3 {x} {y} {} {} {} (2,1),(2,4),(4,3),(2,4),(5,2)
4 {x,y} {y} {} {} {} (2,4),(4,3),(2,4),(5,2)
5 {x,y} {y} {} {x,y} {} (4,3),(4,3),(2,4),(5,2)
6 {x,y} {y} {x,y} {x,y} {} (3,2),(4,3),(2,4),(5,2)
7 {x,y} {x,y} {x,y} {x,y} {} (2,1),(2,4),(4,3),(2,4),(5,2)
8 {x,y} {x,y} {x,y} {x,y} {} (2,4),(4,3),(2,4),(5,2)
9 {x,y} {x,y} {x,y} {x,y} {} (4,3),(2,4),(5,2)
10 {x,y} {x,y} {x,y} {x,y} {} (2,4),(5,2)
11 {x,y} {x,y} {x,y} {x,y} {} (5,2)
12 {x,y} {x,y,w} {x,y} {x,y} {} (2,1),(2,4)
13 {x,y,w} {x,y,w} {x,y} {x,y} {} (2,4)
14 {x,y,w} {x,y,w} {x,y} {x,y,w} {} (4,3)
15 {x,y,w} {x,y,w} {x,y,w} {x,y,w} {} (3,2)
16 {x,y,w} {x,y,w} {x,y,w} {x,y,w} {}
Constant Propagation and Folding
z = 3
x = 1
while x > 0:
if x == 1:
y = 7
else:
y = z + 4
x = 3
print y
===>
z = 3
x = 1
while x > 0:
if x == 1:
y = 7
else:
y = 3 + 4 ***
x = 3
print y
===>
z = 3
x = 1
while x > 0:
if x == 1:
y = 7
else:
y = 7 ***
x = 3
print y
===>
z = 3
x = 1
while x > 0:
if x == 1:
y = 7
else:
y = 7
x = 3
print 7 ***
Lattice for one program variable:
NAC (not a constant)
1 2 3 4 ... (definitely a constant)
UNDEF (don't know anything about the variable)
The after/before's are mappings from variables to values
in the above lattice.
THE FOLLOWING NEEDS TO BE REVISED -Jeremy
Constant propagation is a forward analysis
kill([x:=e]^l) = {(x,c) | for any c}
kill([skip]^l) = {}
kill([e]^l) = {}
gen([x:=e}^l) = { (x,eval(e,l)) }
gen([skip]^l) = {}
gen([e]^l) = {}
eval(n,l) = n
eval(x,l) = c if (x, c) in CP_before(l)
eval(e1 + e2,l) =
eval(e1,l)
eval(e2,l) bot 1 2 ... uninit top
bot bot bot bot bot bot
1 bot 2 3 bot top
2 bot 3 4 bot top
...
uninit bot bot bot bot bot
top bot top top top
CP_before(l) =
if l = init(S*) then
{(x,uninit),(y,uninit),...}
else
|_| { CP_after(l') | (l',l) in flow(S*) }
CP_after(l) = (CP_before(l) - kill(P[l])) |_| gen(P[l])