You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
"""
I noticed a few mistakes in the first notebook in the Coastal Codebook.
Question 14: the explanation is "The long, straight channels indicate tide rather than river dominance, while waves become more important as you move away from the channels to the southwest." , but the correct answer is "Wave dominated north branch and river-dominated central branch". This doesn't make sense to me.
Question 19: every answer from 1 to 8 is wrong, which means that there is no correct answer.
Question 20: it is asked to indicate the wrong statement. The correct answer to this is "The net southern sediment transport is visible in the development of the Dune du Pilat and eastward channel migration", but the explanation is "This statement is false because a spit tends to extend in the direction of net sediment transport, which is in this case going to the south", which seems contradictory to me.
'''
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
TY students for the feedback!
"""
I noticed a few mistakes in the first notebook in the Coastal Codebook.
Question 14: the explanation is "The long, straight channels indicate tide rather than river dominance, while waves become more important as you move away from the channels to the southwest." , but the correct answer is "Wave dominated north branch and river-dominated central branch". This doesn't make sense to me.
Question 19: every answer from 1 to 8 is wrong, which means that there is no correct answer.
Question 20: it is asked to indicate the wrong statement. The correct answer to this is "The net southern sediment transport is visible in the development of the Dune du Pilat and eastward channel migration", but the explanation is "This statement is false because a spit tends to extend in the direction of net sediment transport, which is in this case going to the south", which seems contradictory to me.
'''
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: