-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
replicate Amazon131k-title Performance #13
Comments
Hi Thanks for checking out, SiameseXML. Could you please share the (list of) files available in your data directory and the logs (saved in results dir). I'll take a look and see what's happening. |
Thank you for your fast reply! Here you can see my data folder. log_eval.txt does not have any p@1 values, however in the console i can see the following output:
Here are the training and eval logs in the results folder.
SiameseXML/results/SiameseXML++/Astec/LF-AmazonTitles-131K/v_0_108/extreme/log_train.txt:
|
Do you have any updates? |
Hi Yes, I checked it out and the final results are fine - please see the numbers printed at the end (on terminal) or the log_eval.txt file. It reports numbers for different values of beta as different blocks. The four rows (in a block) mean - precision@{1-5}, nDCG@{1-5}, propensity scored precision@{1-5}, and propensity scored nDCG@{1-5}. So, the precision is 40%+. Moreover, the paper reports results with 512D embeddings which also provides a small boost. The intermediate numbers (with 29% P@1) do not consider the filter file - will fix it. Thanks for pointing this out. Apologies for the delay - I am travelling for a conference. |
Hi @SvenStahlmann, can you please help me understand from where to get the following files:
|
Hi @pranjalks These files are auto generated by the code. Can you please copy-paste any error you might be facing? |
Hi @kunaldahiya, I was able to run the code. Thanks! |
Hello, can you give a short guide how to replicate your performance for the LF-AmazonTitles-131K dateset reported in the paper?
After running
./run_main.sh 0 SiameseXML++ LF-AmazonTitles-131K 0 108
i get the following results via the console:Prediction time (total): 241.77 sec., Prediction time (per sample): 1.79 msec., P@k(%): (knn): 27.16,26.04,23.41,20.68,18.37 (clf): 29.69,28.08,24.90,21.82,19.24 (ens): 29.69,28.08,24.90,21.82,19.24
which means the beste p@1 is 29.69%, am i correct? Did you use different config parameter in the paper or how can we reproduce the 41.42% p@1 in the paper?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: