Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Пофиксена проблема неработающих контрольных значений при дебаге в многопоточной среде #1431

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 2, 2024

Conversation

akpaevj
Copy link
Contributor

@akpaevj akpaevj commented Aug 1, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced scope handling during evaluation with additional properties in the execution frame.
    • Public access to the method for setting the current machine instance for better usability.
  • Improvements

    • Simplified implementation of the method for setting the current machine instance, improving readability.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 1, 2024

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The recent updates to the MachineInstance class enhance functionality by improving scope management in the EvaluateInFrame method. The SetCurrentMachineInstance method has been made public and renamed for clarity, bolstering accessibility. Together, these changes refine control flow and data handling within the script engine, enabling more sophisticated evaluations and ensuring thread-safe management of machine instances.

Changes

Files Change Summary
src/ScriptEngine/Machine/MachineInstance.cs Enhanced EvaluateInFrame to manage execution scopes; changed SetCurrentMachineInstance from private to public static, renaming the parameter for clarity.

Poem

In the land where scripts take flight,
A rabbit hops with pure delight.
With scopes anew and paths so clear,
The machine instance draws us near.
Hopping high, we celebrate,
For code refined is truly great! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2a4c1c8 and 0623225.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/ScriptEngine/Machine/MachineInstance.cs (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
src/ScriptEngine/Machine/MachineInstance.cs (2)

2500-2501: LGTM! Verify the impact of the method's accessibility change.

The SetCurrentMachineInstance method's accessibility change from private to public static and the parameter name modification enhance clarity and accessibility. Ensure that the changes don't introduce any issues.

Verification successful

LGTM! Verify the impact of the method's accessibility change.

The SetCurrentMachineInstance method's accessibility change from private to public static and the parameter name modification enhance clarity and accessibility. Ensure that the changes don't introduce any issues.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the impact of the method's accessibility change in the SetCurrentMachineInstance method.

# Test: Search for the usage of the SetCurrentMachineInstance method. Expect: Correct usage of the public static method.
rg --type cs -A 5 $'SetCurrentMachineInstance'

Length of output: 1726


277-277: LGTM! Verify the correctness of the new property integration.

The addition of the Scopes property initialized with CreateFrameScopes enhances the method's functionality. Ensure that the new property is correctly integrated and doesn't introduce any issues.

{
_currentThreadWorker = inst;
}
public static void SetCurrentMachineInstance(MachineInstance current)
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

А public тут зачем?

Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Поддержу. Оно же не вызывается ниоткуда

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Пока искал проблему, видимо забыл убрать. Исправлю

@EvilBeaver EvilBeaver merged commit d6782a1 into EvilBeaver:develop Aug 2, 2024
1 of 2 checks passed
@akpaevj akpaevj deleted the fix/debug-watcher branch August 2, 2024 06:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants