Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Directed relationships #29

Open
jdvorak001 opened this issue Apr 23, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Directed relationships #29

jdvorak001 opened this issue Apr 23, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@jdvorak001
Copy link
Member

We do have a need for relationships that are only navigable in one direction. For instance, a Textual Document wants to specify the access rights by pointing at the apropriate Textual Document Accessibility Rights. There is however no way for the accessibility specification to know all the documents that reference it.

The way to express this is probably just to leave out the slash and the inverse link:

has-accessibility-rights : The Textual Document Accessibility Rights of the document.

Directed associations are the way to represent this in UML.

This was first brought up in #28.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@jdvorak001