You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
A design note about this: in the (as yet uncommitted) work I've done on this, I've kept the existing Kiln handling of TEI texts, and added pipelines for handling Epidoc texts. This makes sense to me, both so that EFES stays as close as possible to Kiln and because there will doubtless be projects that have a mixture of the two. I state this here so that if anyone has any objections or thoughts, they can let me know before I go further down this road.
Non-Epidoc TEI files continue to live in content/xml/tei/ and Epidoc files live in content/xml/epidoc/. No doubt issues will arise in terms of when we want to have processes/display handle the two together, and when to keep them apart (eg, search). Having them separate at the most fundamental layer is important, though (for those projects that end up using both).
Include the Epidoc example XSLT into EFES, with customisation points corresponding to the XSLT parameters.
This parallels #9.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: