You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I tried changing the hash = ... value for a dependency and was expecting to see a simple message about a hash mismatch. Instead, I get a couple errors that don't mention it:
error[unlicensed]: ring = 0.17.6 is unlicensed
┌─ ring 0.17.6 (registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index):2:9
│
2 │ name = "ring"
│ ^^^^ a valid license expression could not be retrieved for the crate
3 │ version = "0.17.6"
4 │ license = ""
│ - license expression was not specified
5 │ license-files = [
6 │ { path = "/Users/me/.cargo/registry/src/index.crates.io-6f17d22bba15001f/ring-0.17.6/LICENSE", hash = 0xbd0eed23, score = 0.67, license = "OpenSSL" },
│ ---- low confidence in the license text
│
= ring v0.17.6
├── rustls v0.21.9
│ └── ureq v2.9.1
│ ├── clevis v0.4.3
│ │ └── keymgt-clevis v0.1.0
│ └── keymgt-clevis v0.1.0 (*)
├── rustls-webpki v0.101.7
│ ├── rustls v0.21.9 (*)
│ └── ureq v2.9.1 (*)
└── sct v0.7.1
└── rustls v0.21.9 (*)
warning[license-exception-not-encountered]: license exception was not encountered
┌─ /Users/me/Documents/projects/mdb/mariadb-server/rust/deny.toml:32:35
│
32 │ { allow = ["OpenSSL"], name = "ring", version = "*" },
│ ^^^^^^ unmatched license exception
licenses FAILED
It seems like if the hash is incorrect it falls back to other methods?
Describe the solution you'd like
It may still be OK to fall back to other methods, but a notice would help. Maybe something like:
hash mismatch: 0xbd0eed23 was specified but 0x1234abcd was calculated.
falling back to other predicates
This is also nice because you can copy and paste the new hash if you are OK with the new file.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I tried changing the
hash = ...
value for a dependency and was expecting to see a simple message about a hash mismatch. Instead, I get a couple errors that don't mention it:It seems like if the hash is incorrect it falls back to other methods?
Describe the solution you'd like
It may still be OK to fall back to other methods, but a notice would help. Maybe something like:
This is also nice because you can copy and paste the new hash if you are OK with the new file.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: