Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feature: support GetContainmentTree and GetDescriptor or stop offering a ContainmentTreeService. #158

Open
1 of 2 tasks
ben-Draeger opened this issue May 16, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request v1 Version 1 is affected

Comments

@ben-Draeger
Copy link

ben-Draeger commented May 16, 2023

Is there an existing issue for this?

  • I have searched the existing issues

Feature idea

Currently, the sdc11073 ReferenceTest-Device offers a ContainmentTreeService, but answers GetContainmentTree Requests with a SOAPFault: Receiver: not implemented.

This was observed when running SDCcc (7.0.1) against sdc11073 (version: b370b79, should be 1.1.25 I think).

NOTE: The same behaviour can be observed for GetDescriptor Requests.

While offering a ContainmentTreeService is optional (Biceps:R0119), a device offering a ContainmentTreeService must respond to GetContainmentTree- and GetDescriptor-Requests in a way conformant with the Requirements (f.i. Biceps:R5030, R5031, R5032, R5033, R5034, and R5035).

Alternatives

I would suggest to resolve this situation by either not offering a ContainmentTreeService or by implementing GetContainmentTree and GetDescriptor.

Implementation idea

No response

Participation

  • I am willing to submit a pull request to implement this feature.

Link to the idea discussion

No response

@ben-Draeger ben-Draeger added the enhancement New feature or request label May 16, 2023
@ben-Draeger ben-Draeger changed the title feature: support GetContainmentTree or stop offering a ContainmentTreeService. feature: support GetContainmentTree and GetDescriptor or stop offering a ContainmentTreeService. May 16, 2023
@deichmab-draeger deichmab-draeger added the v1 Version 1 is affected label Dec 5, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request v1 Version 1 is affected
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants