Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make multi tenancy optional #511

Open
flyaruu opened this issue Oct 4, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

Make multi tenancy optional #511

flyaruu opened this issue Oct 4, 2019 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
2 - Working Working on this issue. bug Something isn't working enhancement New feature or impovement of existing one.

Comments

@flyaruu
Copy link
Contributor

flyaruu commented Oct 4, 2019

It was always meant to be optional, but we use mostly use multi tenant instances, and over time some features broke for single tenant.

As far as I know:

  • The tester demands a tenant
  • Testing entities from the entitydocumentation only works when supplying a tenant. I also think that the authentication screen in the entitydocumentation should use a dropdown of tenants instead of a text field.
  • Calling an entity does not work without a tenant
  • I'm unsure of all authentication options, I suspect OAuth also does not work without a tenant

Until now we've solved it by just creating a 'dummy' tenant, which works but it adds some noise to the user experience

@ghost ghost added the 0 - Backlog New issue, unvetted. label Sep 10, 2020
@billgemist billgemist self-assigned this Nov 30, 2020
@billgemist billgemist added the 2 - Working Working on this issue. label Dec 2, 2020
@ghost ghost added bug Something isn't working enhancement New feature or impovement of existing one. and removed 0 - Backlog New issue, unvetted. labels Dec 15, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
2 - Working Working on this issue. bug Something isn't working enhancement New feature or impovement of existing one.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants