Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

About the test performance on Cityscapes #3

Open
tjulyz opened this issue Oct 14, 2018 · 2 comments
Open

About the test performance on Cityscapes #3

tjulyz opened this issue Oct 14, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

@tjulyz
Copy link

tjulyz commented Oct 14, 2018

Hi, I have read the paper. It reported a performance 80.6 mIOU on the test set. But why the released model DenseASPP161 only achieved 79.0% mIoU as shown in the chart?
Thank you!
@TheSunWillRise
Copy link

The same issue. I only got 73.6% mIoU by using released model for 1024*512 resolution. I dont know whether it was caused by model or the resolution I used.

@zhixuanli
Copy link

zhixuanli commented Mar 18, 2019 •
edited
Loading

I have trained DenseASPP 161 by myself, but only got 0.7680 on CityScapes Val, with no flip and multi-scale testing.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@TheSunWillRise @tjulyz @zhixuanli