Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Unwrapping never starts on some low poly shells #5

Open
stockto2 opened this issue Apr 5, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Unwrapping never starts on some low poly shells #5

stockto2 opened this issue Apr 5, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@stockto2
Copy link

stockto2 commented Apr 5, 2024

I'm using UVgami as part of an automated workflow, unwrapping low poly meshes. (And it's awesome, thank you for creating this.) Frequently UVgami will get stuck unwrapping 1-4 shells of the model (out of 60 or so) and never finish.

If I click the eyeball by on the 'stuck' shells, the window appears but doesn't have anything in it. If I click the stop button, a message in the console says a stop is initiated, but it never stops. Canceling works as expected, but shows the error mesage: "An unknown error occurred: -1073740791"

For some of the failing meshes, if I try to unwrap them as their own object, it works immediately. For some, it always gets stuck.

A common factor between the shells that fail to unwrap is that they have few vertices, like 20 or less.

In progress, so far so good:
In progress, so far so good
Stuck on these 4:
Stuck on these 4
Eyeball preview is empty:
Eyeball preview is empty
These are the "stuck" meshes:
These are the failing meshes
Console output:
Console output

Possible workaround: If there could be a timeout option for each unwrap, where it stops unwrapping a shell after x seconds if unwrapping isn't finished yet, then I could detect whether the unwrap has happened on each shell and maybe subdivide the faces and try again.

Again thanks for this tool! I hope we can find a way past this bug. Let me know if I can provide any more info.

@DanielBoxer
Copy link
Owner

Hey, glad to hear you find the add-on useful!

The timeout option is a good idea, I'll add this later when I have more time.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants