Return to pool functionality in Administer Workflow

[AndrewAlesik]

References

• Fixes Provide a way to restart a workflow on an Item (or "Return to Pool") from Administer Workflow #1970
• Requires Return to pool functionality in Administer Workflow DSpace#9587

Description

In this pull request I provided new functionality to return item to pull in administer workflow.

Instructions for Reviewers

List of changes:

• First, added function to check if item have pull task.
• Second, added way to return item from administer workflow.
• Thirdly, added translations for new variables.

Checklist

This checklist provides a reminder of what we are going to look for when reviewing your PR. You need not complete this checklist prior to creating your PR (draft PRs are always welcome). If you are unsure about an item in the checklist, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help!

• My PR is small in size (e.g. less than 1,000 lines of code, not including comments & specs/tests), or I have provided reasons as to why that's not possible.
• My PR passes ESLint validation using yarn lint
• My PR doesn't introduce circular dependencies (verified via yarn check-circ-deps)
• My PR includes TypeDoc comments for all new (or modified) public methods and classes. It also includes TypeDoc for large or complex private methods.
• My PR passes all specs/tests and includes new/updated specs or tests based on the Code Testing Guide.
• If my PR includes new libraries/dependencies (in package.json), I've made sure their licenses align with the DSpace BSD License based on the Licensing of Contributions documentation.
• If my PR includes new features or configurations, I've provided basic technical documentation in the PR itself.
• If my PR fixes an issue ticket, I've linked them together.

[tdonohue]

@AndrewAlesik : Thanks for this contribution. This PR is currently failing lint formatting checks. You can view these locally by running yarn lint and many may be possible to fix automatically by running yarn lint --fix.

[AndreiAlesik]

Hi @tdonohue. Thank you for attention. I provided changes to my code and now it passed lint. Could you review my PR?

[github-actions]

Hi @AndrewAlesik,
Conflicts have been detected against the base branch.
Please resolve these conflicts as soon as you can. Thanks!

[github-actions]

Hi @AndrewAlesik,
Conflicts have been detected against the base branch.
Please resolve these conflicts as soon as you can. Thanks!

[github-actions]

Hi @AndrewAlesik,
Conflicts have been detected against the base branch.
Please resolve these conflicts as soon as you can. Thanks!

[tdonohue]

@AndrewAlesik : Just a quick note that this appears to have lint errors again.

[AndrewAlesik]

Hi @tdonohue, thank you for a hint. I've fixed it and it's ready for a review.