You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In SETools there is the possibility to select randomly a subpart of a catalogue randomly. When this is done, the random generator is not seeded so we cannot reproduce the results.
This could have an impact on the PSF model (hopefully a small one). If the same exposure is processed twice, and we split the catalogue to have a training and validation set, there will not be the same for both processing. This results in two different PSF model for the same exposure.
A seed should be added in the config file or/and a way to generate a seed based on the exposure name to avoid this behavior.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In SETools there is the possibility to select randomly a subpart of a catalogue randomly. When this is done, the random generator is not seeded so we cannot reproduce the results.
This could have an impact on the PSF model (hopefully a small one). If the same exposure is processed twice, and we split the catalogue to have a training and validation set, there will not be the same for both processing. This results in two different PSF model for the same exposure.
A seed should be added in the config file or/and a way to generate a seed based on the exposure name to avoid this behavior.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: