We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
http://ndmitchell.com/downloads/paper-rethinking_supercompilation-29_sep_2010.pdf
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Here's some related material from about the same time period.
ndmitchell and SPJ share their views about supercompilation: https://www.reddit.com/r/haskell/comments/2s97d0/the_state_and_future_of_supercompilation_in_ghc/
Bolingbroke's and SPJ's work on supercompilation:
part1: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/supercomp-by-eval.pdf
termination combinators for supercompilation (generalizes tag-bags and homeomorphic embedding): https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/termination-combinators.pdf
part 2 (tag-bags, rollback, speculation, normalization, generalization): https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/design-space.pdf
Bolingbroke's thesis: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/bolingbroke-thesis.pdf
Sorry, something went wrong.
Maybe after our session types arc we'll pick up this supercompilation thread!
No branches or pull requests
http://ndmitchell.com/downloads/paper-rethinking_supercompilation-29_sep_2010.pdf
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: