Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
107 lines (76 loc) · 5.9 KB

static-front-end-hackathon-summary.md

File metadata and controls

107 lines (76 loc) · 5.9 KB
Raw

Summary Guide to the AI-Augmented Static Front End Hackathon

Introduction

This guide provides a comprehensive overview of the hackathon structure, including the Judging and Evaluation Guide, Judging Criteria Matrix, and Project Implementation Guide. These documents are designed to ensure a successful group-based project creation by providing clear expectations, structured evaluation, and a phased approach to project development.

Table of Contents

  1. Overview of the Hackathon
  2. Hackathon Structure
  3. Key Documents
  4. Rationale Behind the Documents
  5. Ensuring Successful Project Creation

Overview of the Hackathon

The AI-Augmented Static Front End Hackathon is a 21-hour event where teams collaborate online to develop a static front-end web application using HTML and CSS, leveraging AI tools like GitHub Copilot and DALL-E. The goal is to create high-quality, innovative projects that demonstrate effective use of AI, solid coding practices, and an exceptional user experience.

Hackathon Structure

Duration and Phases

The hackathon spans 21 hours, broken into distinct phases:

  • Phase 1: Initial Planning (Hours 0-3)
  • Phase 2: Design and Documentation (Hours 3-6)
  • Phase 3: Initial Implementation (Hours 6-15)
  • Phase 4: AI Integration and Enhancement (Hours 15-19)
  • Phase 5: Final Review and Submission (Hours 19-21)

Team Roles

To ensure fair and equal contribution, teams should rotate roles:

  • Project Manager: Oversees the project, ensures deadlines are met.
  • Lead Developer: Focuses on coding and integration of AI tools.
  • Documentation Specialist: Manages documentation and ensures all aspects are recorded.

Key Documents

Judging and Evaluation Guide

This guide outlines the criteria and process used by judges to evaluate the projects. It ensures a fair and transparent evaluation by detailing what is expected in each aspect of the project, including pre-implementation artefacts, project implementation, and post-implementation review.

Judging Criteria Matrix

The matrix provides a detailed breakdown of how points are allocated across various aspects of the project. It includes criteria for:

  • Project Plan and User Stories
  • Design Documentation
  • Version Control Setup
  • AI Tool Usage Plan
  • Code Quality and Standards
  • AI-Generated Code Integration
  • Functional Implementation
  • User Experience Quality
  • Final Project Submission
  • Documentation
  • Retrospective Report

Project Implementation Guide

This guide helps teams navigate through the project phases, providing clear tasks, milestones, and documentation requirements for each phase. It encourages continuous documentation and iterative development, ensuring that the project progresses smoothly and meets all criteria.

Rationale Behind the Documents

Judging and Evaluation Guide

  • Purpose: Ensures fair, consistent, and transparent evaluation of projects.
  • Benefits: Provides clarity on what judges are looking for, helping teams focus on key areas that will impact their scores positively.

Judging Criteria Matrix

  • Purpose: Offers a detailed scoring system that breaks down each component of the project.
  • Benefits: Helps teams understand the weight of each aspect of their project, allowing them to allocate time and resources effectively.

Project Implementation Guide

  • Purpose: Provides a structured approach to project development, reducing the risk of last-minute rushes and ensuring thorough documentation.
  • Benefits: Helps teams manage their time, stay organized, and produce high-quality work throughout the hackathon.

Ensuring Successful Project Creation

Clear Expectations

The combined use of the Judging and Evaluation Guide, Judging Criteria Matrix, and Project Implementation Guide sets clear expectations for what constitutes a successful project. Teams know what is required at each stage and can plan their work accordingly.

Structured Evaluation

The Judging Criteria Matrix ensures that every aspect of the project is evaluated thoroughly and fairly. This structured approach means that teams are judged based on their work's quality and adherence to the criteria, promoting fairness and transparency.

Phased Approach

The Project Implementation Guide's phased approach helps teams manage their time effectively, ensuring that all aspects of the project are developed and documented progressively. This reduces the likelihood of incomplete or rushed work.

Encouraging Collaboration

By defining team roles and rotating them, the hackathon encourages collaboration and ensures that all team members contribute equally. This approach not only fosters teamwork but also helps in the comprehensive development of the project.

Leveraging AI Tools

The emphasis on using AI tools like GitHub Copilot and DALL-E encourages innovation and efficiency. Teams can leverage these tools to enhance their coding and design processes, resulting in more sophisticated and polished projects.

Continuous Documentation

The requirement for continuous documentation ensures that teams maintain a detailed record of their development process. This not only helps in the evaluation but also aids in reflecting on the project during the retrospective phase.

By following the guidelines and structures outlined in these documents, teams can ensure that their projects are not only high-quality and innovative but also meet all the criteria set forth by the judges. This comprehensive approach aims to foster a successful and rewarding hackathon experience for all participants.