[CONTENT] More Thoughts for Traits #3047
Conversation
|
wow there were some wacky errors in there. i guess a lot of the errors arose from the time it spent sitting in my drafts lol... |
Co-authored-by: saema <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: saema <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: saema <[email protected]>
|
Okay I snuck in more edits changing the construction of a lot of verbs. There's no clear consensus on whether thoughts should generally be in the "Verbs" (present) tense or the "Is Verbing" (present continuous). There are some where is makes sense for one over the other, but very often, the present continuous is applied when it just makes the sentence longer and clunky, which is particularly bad for a feature that relies on economy of words. But I might open another branch to edit the thoughts more fully. |
Co-authored-by: saema <[email protected]>
| @@ -538,7 +538,7 @@ | |||
| "Has been imitating the Clan leader's behaviour recently", | |||
| "Knows {PRONOUN/m_c/subject}{VERB/m_c/'re/'s} a shoo-in for deputy", | |||
| "Wonders if the Clan leader talks about {PRONOUN/m_c/object} when {PRONOUN/m_c/subject}{VERB/m_c/'re/'s} not around", | |||
| "Tells the Clan leader {PRONOUN/lead_name/subject}{VERB/lead_name/'ve/'s} been doing a wonderful job leading" | |||
| "Tells lead_name {PRONOUN/lead_name/subject}{VERB/lead_name/'ve/'s} been doing a wonderful job leading" | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
not sure why we're utilizing lead_name here when the r_c cat is already constrained to being the leader? It would be more consistent, imo, if we just used r_c.
| "Tells lead_name {PRONOUN/lead_name/subject}{VERB/lead_name/'ve/'s} been doing a wonderful job leading" | |
| "Tells r_c {PRONOUN/r_c/subject}{VERB/r_c/'ve/'s} been doing a wonderful job leading" |
About The Pull Request
Just padding the general trait-locked thoughts.
Why This Is Good For ClanGen
Adds some flavour :)
Proof of Testing
(childish)
(strict)
(compassionate)
(adventurous)
