You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Average the rank of a given gene across all McIsaac timepoints 15 to end. Reproduce the binning and make a boxplot that shows the 15 minute McIsaac vs binding and the rank averaged mcisaac vs the binding
Use the Kemmeren data rather than the McIsaac 15 minutes
Rank average the McIsaac rank averaged data and the Kemmeren ranks and plot vs binding
For each TF binding data set, rank by poisson, rank by hypergeometric and rank by enrichment. Make a boxplot to describe distribution of the top rank. X-axis should be poisson, hypergeometric and enrichment. The question is, which of these methods yields a larger top rank on average?
Include more of the TFs -- set all mitra lab data to data_passing for the time being, also include TFs with single data_usable = passing
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Average the rank of a given gene across all McIsaac timepoints 15 to end. Reproduce the binning and make a boxplot that shows the 15 minute McIsaac vs binding and the rank averaged mcisaac vs the binding
Use the Kemmeren data rather than the McIsaac 15 minutes
Rank average the McIsaac rank averaged data and the Kemmeren ranks and plot vs binding
For each TF binding data set, rank by poisson, rank by hypergeometric and rank by enrichment. Make a boxplot to describe distribution of the top rank. X-axis should be
poisson
,hypergeometric
andenrichment
. The question is, which of these methods yields a larger top rank on average?Include more of the TFs -- set all mitra lab data to data_passing for the time being, also include TFs with single data_usable = passing
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: