Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

No access to frictionless runs reports #47

Closed
fmomo opened this issue Oct 25, 2024 · 2 comments · Fixed by #56
Closed

No access to frictionless runs reports #47

fmomo opened this issue Oct 25, 2024 · 2 comments · Fixed by #56
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@fmomo
Copy link
Contributor

fmomo commented Oct 25, 2024

Bug description

When clicking on the link provided by the CI/CD action frictionless/validate, one access to the frictionless dashboard web page, but without relevant content, with the message "Cannot load a report"

To Reproduce

https://repository.frictionlessdata.io/pages/dashboard.html?user=Boavizta&repo=ict-sustainability-tools&flow=frictionless&run=11520085574

Expected behavior

JSON OUTPUT

Additional context

@fmomo fmomo added the bug Something isn't working label Oct 25, 2024
@demeringo
Copy link
Contributor

For the time being the only validation workflow implemented does not target the real CSV file.
It was build just to demonstrate the principle (and attemps to validate a different CSV named
old-examples/project-list/data/project-list.csv

That being said, this does not work (does not display validation results properly, as you mentioned).

  1. I will try to make the demo work on the sample data
  2. We can then generalize it to the real csv file.

@demeringo
Copy link
Contributor

I do not manage to make the report work properly.

As a workaround, we can access as the uploaded results (artefacts) of an action.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants