You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am interested in using a finely annotated single-cell reference to estimate proportions of broader cell types.
For example, the Cell2Location tutorial uses a reference of 34 immune and non-immune subtypes.
If we wanted to estimate proportions for broader cell types (e.g., all B cells), would it be better to:
a) re-run the model with the broad cell type annotations, or
b) use the same model (with 34 subtypes) and sum the estimated proportions across relevant subtypes?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Hello,
I am interested in using a finely annotated single-cell reference to estimate proportions of broader cell types.
For example, the Cell2Location tutorial uses a reference of 34 immune and non-immune subtypes.
If we wanted to estimate proportions for broader cell types (e.g., all B cells), would it be better to:
a) re-run the model with the broad cell type annotations, or
b) use the same model (with 34 subtypes) and sum the estimated proportions across relevant subtypes?
Curious to get any feedback on this issue!
-Rhiannon
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions