You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, the infer_radius has a preference for determining it from the lbol, but it should be what it was before of None. So, there is not preference and the user can choose. Trying to run an sed, and testing out the new version, and it immediately gives me a radius based on the lbol and not the evo models like I would prefer.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@hover2pi Mmm, while it is not what I prefer, the issues I am having is that at the beginning of the sed I provide an evo model, yet it still provides the infer radius from lbol when I run .results or make_sed(), and I have to then run infer_radius(from='evo_model') and then run .results or make_sed() again to make sure I get the teff based on the evo model radius and not the lbol inferred radius. I don't know it just seemed a bit backward.
Currently, the infer_radius has a preference for determining it from the lbol, but it should be what it was before of None. So, there is not preference and the user can choose. Trying to run an sed, and testing out the new version, and it immediately gives me a radius based on the lbol and not the evo models like I would prefer.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: