You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
@Arixeyeion We did an automated analysis of your code to detect potential areas to improve the code quality. We are sharing the results below, to help you improve the iP code further.
IMPORTANT: Note that the script looked for just a few easy-to-detect problems only, and at-most three example are given i.e., there can be other areas/places to improve.
Add rest of the CodeQuality changes.
There were some magic numbers in the code so this commits rectify that problem.
Doing away with magic numbers makes it easier to debug in future and provides clarity in code.
Subject line should not end with a period
body not wrapped at 72 characters: e.g., There were some magic numbers in the code so this commits rectify that problem.
Late commit for assertions.
Assertions were implemented as a branch but not committed to before working on the CodingQuality branch.
Let's commit this version with some CodingQuality implementation first as practice for pull requests.
This way, I still get to see the effects of some merging conflicts and parallel pull requests.
Subject line should not end with a period
body not wrapped at 72 characters: e.g., Assertions were implemented as a branch but not committed to before working on the CodingQuality branch.
Suggestion: Follow the given conventions for Git commit messages for future commits (do not modify past commit messages as doing so will change the commit timestamp that we used to detect your commit timings).
Aspect: Binary files in repo
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
ℹ️ The bot account used to post this issue is un-manned. Do not reply to this post (as those replies will not be read). Instead, contact [email protected] if you want to follow up on this post.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@Arixeyeion We did an automated analysis of your code to detect potential areas to improve the code quality. We are sharing the results below, to help you improve the iP code further.
IMPORTANT: Note that the script looked for just a few easy-to-detect problems only, and at-most three example are given i.e., there can be other areas/places to improve.
Aspect: Tab Usage
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Naming boolean variables/methods
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Brace Style
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Package Name Style
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Class Name Style
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Dead Code
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Method Length
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Class size
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Header Comments
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Recent Git Commit Message
possible problems in commit
c80a8aa
:There were some magic numbers in the code so this commits rectify that problem.
possible problems in commit
5f843c9
:Assertions were implemented as a branch but not committed to before working on the CodingQuality branch.
Suggestion: Follow the given conventions for Git commit messages for future commits (do not modify past commit messages as doing so will change the commit timestamp that we used to detect your commit timings).
Aspect: Binary files in repo
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
ℹ️ The bot account used to post this issue is un-manned. Do not reply to this post (as those replies will not be read). Instead, contact
[email protected]
if you want to follow up on this post.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: