-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Request: Heat Conduction P2P #41
Comments
I was going to add it early on, but I'm unsure how to handle P2P power drain. I don't think Mekanism lets me know how much heat energy was actually transferred between two blocks, but I'll check again. Keep this issue open regardless |
I am a bit confused here. I looked at your p2p chemical tunnel, and it just said it drained 4 power per tick: |
@Cuttleguy what are you talking about? That's chemicals, not heat, and the power drain code for chemicals is right next to it |
Highlighted the wrong thing sorry |
At the end of the day, I'm not sure it needs a drain really. As the the creation of heat itself was the energy. Draining it again is a double dip on the power costs for things just for routing. Assuming that was the only thing keeping it locked down from being a feature. |
Is there any chance of a P2P being made to support Mek's Thermodynamic conductors for lossless heat over distance? Right now, the base gameplay of mek just opts to ignore their use and go for entangloporter or placing the heat source adjacent to the destination.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: