Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Request: Heat Conduction P2P #41

Open
Soaryn opened this issue Oct 2, 2023 · 5 comments
Open

Request: Heat Conduction P2P #41

Soaryn opened this issue Oct 2, 2023 · 5 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed

Comments

@Soaryn
Copy link

Soaryn commented Oct 2, 2023

Is there any chance of a P2P being made to support Mek's Thermodynamic conductors for lossless heat over distance? Right now, the base gameplay of mek just opts to ignore their use and go for entangloporter or placing the heat source adjacent to the destination.

@ramidzkh
Copy link
Collaborator

ramidzkh commented Oct 2, 2023

I was going to add it early on, but I'm unsure how to handle P2P power drain. I don't think Mekanism lets me know how much heat energy was actually transferred between two blocks, but I'll check again. Keep this issue open regardless

@ramidzkh ramidzkh added enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed labels Dec 16, 2023
@Cuttleguy
Copy link

I was going to add it early on, but I'm unsure how to handle P2P power drain. I don't think Mekanism lets me know how much heat energy was actually transferred between two blocks, but I'll check again. Keep this issue open regardless

I am a bit confused here. I looked at your p2p chemical tunnel, and it just said it drained 4 power per tick:
https://github.com/AppliedEnergistics/Applied-Mekanistics/blob/a31a7a821523752cab8d4b3f170339a147db9906/src/main/java/me/ramidzkh/mekae2/ae2/ChemicalP2PTunnelPart.java#L219C9-L224C10

@ramidzkh
Copy link
Collaborator

ramidzkh commented Aug 6, 2024

@Cuttleguy what are you talking about? That's chemicals, not heat, and the power drain code for chemicals is right next to it

@Cuttleguy
Copy link

Highlighted the wrong thing sorry

@Soaryn
Copy link
Author

Soaryn commented Aug 23, 2024

At the end of the day, I'm not sure it needs a drain really. As the the creation of heat itself was the energy. Draining it again is a double dip on the power costs for things just for routing. Assuming that was the only thing keeping it locked down from being a feature.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants