You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The default is "NewestOnly" which will drop old frames if not retrieved fast enough. A good alternative is "OldestFirst" which will store frames in a buffer, but drop new frames if buffer is full.
For live applications NewestOnly makes sense, but for many scientific applications where the videos are analyzed posthoc you often want OldestFirst to minimize frame drops.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Assuming no dropped frames, does this make a difference?
I don't think this makes a difference when there are no dropped frames in the first place.
What happens to the frame counter provided by the camera?
I can't find documentation on this, but presumably the frame ids are buffered?
Why does NewestOnly doesn't make sense for many scientific applications? It sounds like something important for close loop experiments?
Sorry I phrased that poorly. I agree it's important for closed loop experiments, which is what I was including in "live applications". It should really be framed as "live" vs "posthoc" analysis.
This would allow users to take advantage of the buffer built into to the Spinnaker cameras
You can see some documentation here:
https://www.1stvision.com/cameras/IDS/IDS-manuals/en/stream-buffer-handling-mode.html
The default is "NewestOnly" which will drop old frames if not retrieved fast enough. A good alternative is "OldestFirst" which will store frames in a buffer, but drop new frames if buffer is full.
For live applications NewestOnly makes sense, but for many scientific applications where the videos are analyzed posthoc you often want OldestFirst to minimize frame drops.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: