Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
Is this any useful in practice? i.e., does any optimization require it? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Currently, Alive2 does not distinguish between +NaN and -NaN:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/8TB3fv
I found that there are a few library functions in C that safely deals with the sign of NaN:
Z3 does not seem to support signed NaNs (maybe all SMT solvers don't?); would there be an efficient way to implement them in Alive2?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions