Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

timing work-around for stATOM proposal #8347

Closed
Tracked by #8177
turadg opened this issue Sep 18, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #8398
Closed
Tracked by #8177

timing work-around for stATOM proposal #8347

turadg opened this issue Sep 18, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #8398
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@turadg
Copy link
Member

turadg commented Sep 18, 2023

What is the Problem Being Solved?

@0xpatrickdev made an add-stATOM proposal. We've since uncovered some timing gotchas, noted in #8177 (comment)

Description of the Design

Adapt the proposal logic in #8177 that works around the timing problem and submit to https://github.com/0xpatrickdev/agoric-vault-collateral-proposal/ for consideration in the Mainnet proposal

includes adding code to handle timing constraints to avoid #8296, #8307
per meeting with @turadg and co

Without a fix, it's crucial that the oracle be started before the auction, and that the new brand is added to the auction after an auction round ends and before the next one starts.

Security Considerations

Scaling Considerations

Test Plan

Upgrade Considerations

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants