Migrate to shadcn components?

[ErikBjare]

Vue-bootstrap is keeping us on Vue 2. There is a Vue-bootstrap version developed for Vue 3, but it is taking forever to mature.

I've been using shadcn in a project recently and found it a very sensible approach.

Nice that it gives us control over style and implementation while making the markup standards compliant.

Shadcn for Vue exists here: https://www.shadcn-vue.com/

[sreeharsha-rav]

Good idea to discuss about UI libraries. I reviewed libraries and here is my analysis:

Shadcn UI:

• Initially appealing, but upon closer inspection, it has some limitations
• Built on top of RadixVue, which adds overhead
• Relatively new with fewer commits
• Has 120 dependencies, making it somewhat heavy
• Only 103 repositories currently depend on it
• Chart functionality needs improvement

PrimeVue:

• Offers a wide range of high-quality components
• Impressive track record with over 10,000 commits
• Long-term maintenance seems promising
• Leaner with 77 dependencies
• Used by over 25,000 repositories, indicating strong community adoption
• Official Chart.js integration for robust charting capabilities

NuxtUI:

• Officially maintained by the Nuxt team, which is a plus
• Lightest option among the three built upon headless UI
• Has 74 dependencies
• Currently has 0 dependents, suggesting it's not widely adopted yet
• Lacks official chart library integration

After considering these options, I believe PrimeVue might be the best choice for long-term.
I'll work on a mockup using PrimeVue to visualize the implementation sometime.

[ErikBjare]

@sreeharsha-rav I think your analysis fails to take into account the fundamentally different nature of shadcn (vendoring components instead of depending), which leads to your review not being very fair. "Fewer commits" can also be good, actually (and what I would expect/want).

I've never heard of PrimeVue, but they seem to have some paid offering, which I think is a red flag.

All in all, the point of this issue was to migrate to components we own ourselves (like shadcn/ui), so that we don't have to rely on a big styled component library like VueBootstrap/PrimeVue/NuxtUI, instead building our own components (copying from shadcn) with Radix.

[sreeharsha-rav]

@ErikBjare Woah, you are right that ShadcnUI is vendoring from Radix lol, but RadixVue, ShadcnUI, NuxtUI, PrimeVue are all MIT licensed, I don't think ownership should be a concern at all, you could style on top of it.

If ur referring to paid offerings at PrimeVue, I think it's premade blocks like full component dashboards, which is normal for any lib to make money to support their maintainence longterm. Why is it a red flag?

Components should be easy to maintain and upgrade, whatever OSS lib supports it, use it. All are OSS based.

If you want custom styling all aforementioned libraries support it, it's just a matter of preference and easing developer anxiety about maintenance and migration.

[ErikBjare]

Woah, you are right that ShadcnUI is vendoring from Radix lol

The vendoring approach with Radix+Tailwind was the appeal for me.

If ur referring to paid offerings at PrimeVue, I think it's premade blocks like full component dashboards, which is normal for any lib to make money to support their maintainence longterm. Why is it a red flag?

Just a pattern I've noticed in the past with such setups. It could be fine, just didn't give a great impression.

Components should be easy to maintain and upgrade, whatever OSS lib supports it, use it. All are OSS based.

We're in the current situation because we use VueBootstrap which went unmaintained. The idea behind this issue was to investigate if using shadcn could give us a migration path and help ensure this does not happen again by taking ownership of the base components.