Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Do we still need URN subclassifications. #161

Open
peterbrightwell opened this issue Apr 12, 2021 · 3 comments
Open

Do we still need URN subclassifications. #161

peterbrightwell opened this issue Apr 12, 2021 · 3 comments

Comments

@peterbrightwell
Copy link
Contributor

This came up in review for proposed v1.3.1

2.1. APIs - Common Keys.md mentions possibly using future format subclassifications such as urn:x-nmos:format:video.raw. Should this be removed/deprecated, as in practice we use IANA media_type?
@peterbrightwell peterbrightwell mentioned this issue Apr 12, 2021
Merged
@peterbrightwell
Copy link
Contributor Author

Are there any examples of other subclassifications that are actually used that would be more suitable here? Is the .ucast / .mcast example used in practice?

@garethsb
Copy link
Contributor

garethsb commented May 5, 2021

Yes it is (though causes pain, e.g. Query API Basic Query for transport=urn:x-nmos:transport:rtp doesn't return the subclassifications because it uses exact string match)

@peterbrightwell
Copy link
Contributor Author

We made further improvements for v1.3.1 release. See #166

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@peterbrightwell @garethsb