Channels capacity #365
-
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 2 comments
-
Hello, Phoenix is indeed using MPP but the split won't be optimal in many cases. If the sender is not using trampoline (which is the case with many LN wallets) the payment will likely not be split. The sender does not know about your 4 channels A, B, C, and D. Also, a channel's incoming capacity is affected by the on-chain feerate. The feerate is currently quite high, and if your channels are small (like in your screenshot) this can lock a substantial portion of your incoming capacity. But that is not wasted space, it guarantees the safety of your channels. You can find more info about this in the FAQ: https://phoenix.acinq.co/faq#how-much-can-i-receive-with-my-existing-channels |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Thanks for answering @dpad85 , I know about commit fees that could be variable depending on the onchain fees (especially in case of small channels). OK now is clear, were the commit fees affecting it. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Hello,
Phoenix is indeed using MPP but the split won't be optimal in many cases. If the sender is not using trampoline (which is the case with many LN wallets) the payment will likely not be split. The sender does not know about your 4 channels A, B, C, and D.
Also, a channel's incoming capacity is affected by the on-chain feerate. The feerate is currently quite high, and if your channels are small (like in your screenshot) this can lock a substantial portion of your incoming capacity. But that is not wasted space, it guarantees the safety of your channels.
You can find more info about this in the FAQ: https://phoenix.acinq.co/faq#how-much-can-i-receive-with-my-existing-channels