You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
"The current method of defining an ROI in three dimensions is as a Union of Shape objects, each of which defines the geometry to which that 3D ROI would cut the 2D Plane the Shape is attached."
Incorporating support for a 3D ROI specification model is a good idea.
The following suggestions emerged when discussing with Andreas Bueckle at the CFDE Fall Meeting on 2024-10-22.
strambc
changed the title
#ROI_boundariesformat headerfield and #ROI_boundaries column
#ROI_Boundaries_Format headerfield and #ROI_Boundaries column
Oct 23, 2024
strambc
changed the title
#ROI_Boundaries_Format headerfield and #ROI_Boundaries column
ROI/Cell Mapping -- ##ROI_Boundaries_Format header field and #ROI_Boundaries column
Oct 23, 2024
How are we going to capture 3D ROI boundaries in FOF-CT?
Currently, there are two relevant fields in the ROI/Cell Mapping Table:
OME Data Model has a Region of Interest (ROI) model.
However, this is primarily designed for 2D ROIs.
To render a 3D shape, they state the following:
"The current method of defining an ROI in three dimensions is as a Union of Shape objects, each of which defines the geometry to which that 3D ROI would cut the 2D Plane the Shape is attached."
Incorporating support for a 3D ROI specification model is a good idea.
The following suggestions emerged when discussing with Andreas Bueckle at the CFDE Fall Meeting on 2024-10-22.
Most formats record shape data as
Examples
glTF
SPECIFICATIONS: https://www.khronos.org/gltf/#gltf-spec
OBJ
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: