forked from microsoft/QuantumKatas
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
ReferenceImplementation.qs
599 lines (504 loc) · 26.8 KB
/
ReferenceImplementation.qs
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
// Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
// Licensed under the MIT license.
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
// This file contains reference solutions to all tasks.
// The tasks themselves can be found in Tasks.qs file.
// We recommend that you try to solve the tasks yourself first,
// but feel free to look up the solution if you get stuck.
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
namespace Quantum.Kata.Measurements {
open Microsoft.Quantum.Diagnostics;
open Microsoft.Quantum.Measurement;
open Microsoft.Quantum.Arithmetic;
open Microsoft.Quantum.Intrinsic;
open Microsoft.Quantum.Canon;
open Microsoft.Quantum.Math;
open Microsoft.Quantum.Convert;
open Microsoft.Quantum.Arrays;
open Microsoft.Quantum.Logical;
open Microsoft.Quantum.Random;
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
// Part I. Single-Qubit Measurements
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
// Task 1.1. |0⟩ or |1⟩ ?
// Input: a qubit which is guaranteed to be in |0⟩ or |1⟩ state.
// Output: true if the qubit was in |1⟩ state, or false if it was in |0⟩ state.
// The state of the qubit at the end of the operation does not matter.
operation IsQubitOne_Reference (q : Qubit) : Bool {
return M(q) == One;
}
// Task 1.2. Set qubit to |0⟩ state
operation InitializeQubit_Reference (q : Qubit) : Unit {
if (M(q) == One) {
X(q);
}
}
// Task 1.3. |+⟩ or |-⟩ ?
// Input: a qubit which is guaranteed to be in |+⟩ or |-⟩ state
// (|+⟩ = (|0⟩ + |1⟩) / sqrt(2), |-⟩ = (|0⟩ - |1⟩) / sqrt(2)).
// Output: true if the qubit was in |+⟩ state, or false if it was in |-⟩ state.
// The state of the qubit at the end of the operation does not matter.
operation IsQubitPlus_Reference (q : Qubit) : Bool {
H(q);
return M(q) == Zero;
}
// Task 1.4. |A⟩ or |B⟩ ?
// Inputs:
// 1) angle alpha, in radians, represented as Double
// 2) a qubit which is guaranteed to be in |A⟩ or |B⟩ state
// |A⟩ = cos(alpha) * |0⟩ + sin(alpha) * |1⟩,
// |B⟩ = - sin(alpha) * |0⟩ + cos(alpha) * |1⟩.
// Output: true if the qubit was in |A⟩ state, or false if it was in |B⟩ state.
// The state of the qubit at the end of the operation does not matter.
operation IsQubitA_Reference (alpha : Double, q : Qubit) : Bool {
// |0⟩ is converted into |A⟩ and |1⟩ into |B⟩ by Ry(2.0 * alpha)
// so |A⟩ is converted into |0⟩ by the opposite rotation
Ry(-2.0 * alpha, q);
return M(q) == Zero;
}
// Task 1.5. |00⟩ or |11⟩ ?
// Input: two qubits (stored in an array of length 2) which are guaranteed to be in either the |00⟩ or the |11⟩ state.
// Output: 0 if the qubits were in the |00⟩ state,
// 1 if they were in |11⟩ state.
// The state of the qubits at the end of the operation does not matter.
operation ZeroZeroOrOneOne_Reference (qs : Qubit[]) : Int {
// it's enough to do one measurement on any qubit
return M(qs[0]) == Zero ? 0 | 1;
}
// Task 1.6. Distinguish four basis states
// Input: two qubits (stored in an array) which are guaranteed to be
// in one of the four basis states (|00⟩, |01⟩, |10⟩ or |11⟩).
// Output: 0 if qubits were in |00⟩ state,
// 1 if they were in |01⟩ state,
// 2 if they were in |10⟩ state,
// 3 if they were in |11⟩ state.
// The state of the qubits at the end of the operation does not matter.
operation BasisStateMeasurement_Reference (qs : Qubit[]) : Int {
// Measurement on the first qubit gives the higher bit of the answer, on the second - the lower
let m1 = M(qs[0]) == Zero ? 0 | 1;
let m2 = M(qs[1]) == Zero ? 0 | 1;
return m1 * 2 + m2;
}
// Task 1.7. Distinguish two basis states given by bit strings
// Inputs:
// 1) N qubits (stored in an array) which are guaranteed to be
// in one of the two basis states described by the given bit strings.
// 2) two bit string represented as Bool[]s.
// Output: 0 if qubits were in the basis state described by the first bit string,
// 1 if they were in the basis state described by the second bit string.
// Bit values false and true correspond to |0⟩ and |1⟩ states.
// The state of the qubits at the end of the operation does not matter.
// You are guaranteed that the both bit strings have the same length as the qubit array,
// and that the bit strings will differ in at least one bit.
// You can use exactly one measurement.
// Example: for bit strings [false, true, false] and [false, false, true]
// return 0 corresponds to state |010⟩, and return 1 corresponds to state |001⟩.
function FindFirstDiff_Reference (bits1 : Bool[], bits2 : Bool[]) : Int {
for i in 0 .. Length(bits1) - 1 {
if (bits1[i] != bits2[i]) {
return i;
}
}
return -1;
}
operation TwoBitstringsMeasurement_Reference (qs : Qubit[], bits1 : Bool[], bits2 : Bool[]) : Int {
Fact(Length(bits1) == Length(bits2), "Bit arrays should have the same length");
Fact(Length(qs) == Length(bits1), "Arrays should have the same length");
// find the first index at which the bit strings are different and measure it
let firstDiff = FindFirstDiff_Reference(bits1, bits2);
let res = M(qs[firstDiff]) == One;
return res == bits1[firstDiff] ? 0 | 1;
}
// Task 1.8. Distinguish two superposition states given by two arrays of bit strings - 1 measurement
function FindFirstSuperpositionDiff_Reference (bits1 : Bool[][], bits2 : Bool[][], Nqubits : Int) : Int {
for i in 0 .. Nqubits - 1 {
// count the number of 1s in i-th position in bit strings of both arrays
mutable val1 = 0;
mutable val2 = 0;
for j in 0 .. Length(bits1) - 1 {
if (bits1[j][i]) {
set val1 += 1;
}
}
for k in 0 .. Length(bits2) - 1 {
if (bits2[k][i]) {
set val2 += 1;
}
}
if ((val1 == Length(bits1) and val2 == 0) or (val1 == 0 and val2 == Length(bits2))) {
return i;
}
}
return -1;
}
operation SuperpositionOneMeasurement_Reference (qs : Qubit[], bits1 : Bool[][], bits2 : Bool[][]) : Int {
Fact(Length(bits1[0]) == Length(bits2[0]), "Second dimension of bit arrays should have the same length");
Fact(Length(bits1[0]) == Length(qs), "Second dimension of bit arrays should be equal to number of qubits");
// find the position in which the bit strings of two arrays differ
let diff = FindFirstSuperpositionDiff_Reference(bits1, bits2, Length(qs));
let res = ResultAsBool(M(qs[diff]));
if (res == bits1[0][diff]) {
return 0;
}
else {
return 1;
}
}
// Task 1.9. Distinguish two superposition states given by two arrays of bit strings
operation SuperpositionMeasurement_Reference (qs : Qubit[], bits1 : Bool[][], bits2 : Bool[][]) : Int {
Fact(Length(bits1[0]) == Length(bits2[0]), "Second dimension of bit arrays should have the same length");
Fact(Length(bits1[0]) == Length(qs), "Second dimension of bit arrays should be equal to number of qubits");
// measure all qubits and check in which array you can find the resulting bit string
let meas = ResultArrayAsBoolArray(MultiM(qs));
for i in 0 .. Length(bits1) - 1 {
if (EqualA(EqualB, bits1[i], meas)) {
return 0;
}
}
return 1;
}
// Alternate reference implementation for task 1.9
// Slightly more expensive, but uses built-in functions
operation SuperpositionMeasurement_Alternate (qs : Qubit[], bits1 : Bool[][], bits2 : Bool[][]) : Int {
Fact(Length(bits1[0]) == Length(bits2[0]), "Second dimension of bit Arrays should have the same length");
Fact(Length(bits1[0]) == Length(qs), "Second dimension of bit Arrays should be equal to number of qubits");
// measure all qubits and, treating the result as an integer, check whether it can be found in one of the bit arrays
let measuredState = ResultArrayAsInt(MultiM(qs));
for s in bits1 {
if (BoolArrayAsInt(s) == measuredState) {
return 0;
}
}
return 1;
}
// Task 1.10. |0...0⟩ state or W state ?
// Input: N qubits (stored in an array) which are guaranteed to be
// either in |0...0⟩ state
// or in W state (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W_state).
// Output: 0 if qubits were in |0...0⟩ state,
// 1 if they were in W state.
// The state of the qubits at the end of the operation does not matter.
operation AllZerosOrWState_Reference (qs : Qubit[]) : Int {
// measure all qubits; if there is exactly one One, it's W state, if there are no Ones, it's |0...0⟩
// (and there should never be two or more Ones)
mutable countOnes = 0;
for q in qs {
if (M(q) == One) {
set countOnes += 1;
}
}
if (countOnes > 1) {
fail "Impossible to get multiple Ones when measuring W state";
}
return countOnes == 0 ? 0 | 1;
}
// Alternate reference implementation for task 1.10
operation AllZerosOrWState_Alternate (qs : Qubit[]) : Int {
// measure all qubits and convert the result into an integer;
// if we get 0 then the state is |0...0⟩, any non-0 integer indicates W state
return ResultArrayAsInt(MultiM(qs)) == 0 ? 0 | 1;
}
// Task 1.11. GHZ state or W state ?
// Input: N >= 2 qubits (stored in an array) which are guaranteed to be
// either in GHZ state (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenberger%E2%80%93Horne%E2%80%93Zeilinger_state)
// or in W state (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W_state).
// Output: 0 if qubits were in GHZ state,
// 1 if they were in W state.
// The state of the qubits at the end of the operation does not matter.
operation GHZOrWState_Reference (qs : Qubit[]) : Int {
// measure all qubits; if there is exactly one One, it's W state,
// if there are no Ones or all are Ones, it's GHZ
// (and there should never be a different number of Ones)
mutable countOnes = 0;
for q in qs {
if (M(q) == One) {
set countOnes += 1;
}
}
let N = Length(qs);
if (countOnes > 1 and countOnes < N) {
fail $"Impossible to get {countOnes} Ones when measuring W state or GHZ state on {N} qubits";
}
return countOnes == 1 ? 1 | 0;
}
// Alternate reference implementation for task 1.11
operation GHZOrWState_Alternate (qs : Qubit[]) : Int {
// measure all qubits and convert the measurement results into an integer;
// measuring GHZ state will produce either a 0...0 result or a 1...1 result, which correspond to integers 0 and 2ᴺ-1, respectively
let m = ResultArrayAsInt(MultiM(qs));
return (m == 0 or m == (1 <<< Length(qs))-1) ? 0 | 1;
}
// Task 1.12. Distinguish four Bell states
// Input: two qubits (stored in an array) which are guaranteed to be in one of the four Bell states:
// |Φ⁺⟩ = (|00⟩ + |11⟩) / sqrt(2)
// |Φ⁻⟩ = (|00⟩ - |11⟩) / sqrt(2)
// |Ψ⁺⟩ = (|01⟩ + |10⟩) / sqrt(2)
// |Ψ⁻⟩ = (|01⟩ - |10⟩) / sqrt(2)
// Output: 0 if qubits were in |Φ⁺⟩ state,
// 1 if they were in |Φ⁻⟩ state,
// 2 if they were in |Ψ⁺⟩ state,
// 3 if they were in |Ψ⁻⟩ state.
// The state of the qubits at the end of the operation does not matter.
operation BellState_Reference (qs : Qubit[]) : Int {
CNOT(qs[0], qs[1]);
H(qs[0]);
// these changes brought the state back to one of the 2-qubit basis states from task 1.6 (but in different order)
let m1 = M(qs[0]) == Zero ? 0 | 1;
let m2 = M(qs[1]) == Zero ? 0 | 1;
return m2 * 2 + m1;
}
// Task 1.13. Distinguish four orthogonal 2-qubit states
// Input: two qubits (stored in an array) which are guaranteed to be in one of the four orthogonal states:
// |S0⟩ = (|00⟩ + |01⟩ + |10⟩ + |11⟩) / 2
// |S1⟩ = (|00⟩ - |01⟩ + |10⟩ - |11⟩) / 2
// |S2⟩ = (|00⟩ + |01⟩ - |10⟩ - |11⟩) / 2
// |S3⟩ = (|00⟩ - |01⟩ - |10⟩ + |11⟩) / 2
// Output: 0 if qubits were in |S0⟩ state,
// 1 if they were in |S1⟩ state,
// 2 if they were in |S2⟩ state,
// 3 if they were in |S3⟩ state.
// The state of the qubits at the end of the operation does not matter.
operation TwoQubitState_Reference (qs : Qubit[]) : Int {
// These states are produced by H ⊗ H, applied to four basis states.
// To measure them, apply H ⊗ H followed by basis state measurement
// implemented in BasisStateMeasurement_Reference.
H(qs[0]);
H(qs[1]);
return BasisStateMeasurement_Reference(qs);
}
// Task 1.14*. Distinguish four orthogonal 2-qubit states, part two
// Input: two qubits (stored in an array) which are guaranteed to be in one of the four orthogonal states:
// |S0⟩ = ( |00⟩ - |01⟩ - |10⟩ - |11⟩) / 2
// |S1⟩ = (-|00⟩ + |01⟩ - |10⟩ - |11⟩) / 2
// |S2⟩ = (-|00⟩ - |01⟩ + |10⟩ - |11⟩) / 2
// |S3⟩ = (-|00⟩ - |01⟩ - |10⟩ + |11⟩) / 2
// Output: 0 if qubits were in |S0⟩ state,
// 1 if they were in |S1⟩ state,
// 2 if they were in |S2⟩ state,
// 3 if they were in |S3⟩ state.
// The state of the qubits at the end of the operation does not matter.
operation TwoQubitStatePartTwo_Reference (qs : Qubit[]) : Int {
// Try this!
H(qs[1]);
// Now, each of the four input states has been converted to a Bell
// state:
// |S0⟩ ↦ |Ψ⁻⟩ = (|01⟩ - |10⟩) / sqrt(2)
// |S1⟩ ↦ |Ψ⁺⟩ = (|01⟩ + |10⟩) / sqrt(2)
// |S2⟩ ↦ |Φ⁻⟩ = (|00⟩ - |11⟩) / sqrt(2)
// |S3⟩ ↦ |Φ⁺⟩ = (|00⟩ + |11⟩) / sqrt(2)
// We can refer now to task 1.10 (what follows is an alternate solution
// to 1.10, with some tweaks to reorder the output values).
CNOT(qs[0], qs[1]);
H(qs[0]);
let m1 = M(qs[0]) == One ? 0 | 1;
let m2 = M(qs[1]) == One ? 0 | 1;
return m2 * 2 + m1;
}
// Alternate reference implementation for Task 1.14
operation TwoQubitStatePartTwo_Alternate (qs : Qubit[]) : Int {
// Observe that the unitary matrix A formed by the columns |S0⟩, ..., |S3⟩
// is up to permutations matrices and diagonal +1/-1 matrices equal to the
// tensor product H ⊗ H when multiplied from the left and the right.
// Specifically, A = diag(-1, 1, 1, 1) (H ⊗ H) diag(-1, 1, 1, 1) pi,
// where pi is the permutation (1,2) corresponding to a swap of 2 qubits.
// Apply permutation pi
SWAP(qs[0], qs[1]);
// Apply diag(..) (H ⊗ H) diag(..)
within {
ApplyDiagonalUnitary([PI(), 0.0, 0.0, 0.0], LittleEndian(qs));
} apply {
ApplyToEach(H, qs);
}
return BasisStateMeasurement_Reference(qs);
}
// Task 1.15**. Distinguish two orthogonal states on three qubits
operation ThreeQubitMeasurement_Reference (qs : Qubit[]) : Int {
// We first apply a unitary operation to the input state so that it maps the first state
// to the W-state (see Task 10 in the "Superposition" kata) 1/sqrt(3) ( |100⟩ + |010⟩ + |001⟩ ).
// This can be accomplished by a tensor product of the form I₂ ⊗ R ⊗ R², where
// - I₂ denotes the 2x2 identity matrix which is applied to qubit 0,
// - R is the diagonal matrix diag(1, ω^-1) = diag(1, ω²) which is applied to qubit 1,
// - R² = diag(1, ω) which is applied to qubit 2.
// Note that upon applying the operator I₂ ⊗ R ⊗ R²,
// the second state gets then mapped to 1/sqrt(3) ( |100⟩ + ω |010⟩ + ω² |001⟩ ).
//
// We can now perfectly distinguish these two states by invoking the inverse of the state prep
// routine for W-states (as in Task 10 of "Superposition") which will map the first state to the
// state |000⟩ and the second state to some state which is guaranteed to be perpendicular to
// the state |000⟩, i.e., the second state gets mapped to a superposition that does not involve
// |000⟩. Now, the two states can be perfectly distinguished (while leaving them intact) by
// attaching an ancilla qubit, computing the OR function of the three bits (which can be
// accomplished using a multiply-controlled X gate with inverted inputs) and measuring said
// ancilla qubit.
mutable result = 0;
// rotate qubit 1 by angle - 2π/3 around z-axis
Rz((4.0 * PI()) / 3.0, qs[1]);
// rotate qubit 2 by angle - 4π/3 around z-axis
Rz((8.0 * PI()) / 3.0, qs[2]);
// Apply inverse state prep of 1/sqrt(3) ( |100⟩ + |010⟩ + |001⟩ )
Adjoint WState_Arbitrary_Reference(qs);
// need one qubit to store result of comparison "000" vs "not 000"
use anc = Qubit();
// compute the OR function into anc
(ControlledOnInt(0, X))(qs, anc);
set result = MResetZ(anc) == One ? 0 | 1;
// Fix up the state so that it is identical to the input state
// (this is not required if the state of the qubits after the operation does not matter)
// Apply state prep of 1/sqrt(3) ( |100⟩ + |010⟩ + |001⟩ )
WState_Arbitrary_Reference(qs);
// rotate qubit 1 by angle 2π/3 around z-axis
Rz((-4.0 * PI()) / 3.0, qs[1]);
// rotate qubit 2 by angle 4π/3 around z-axis
Rz((-8.0 * PI()) / 3.0, qs[2]);
// finally, we return the result
return result;
}
// An alternative solution to task 1.15, using a simpler measurement
operation ThreeQubitMeasurement_SimpleMeasurement (qs : Qubit[]) : Int {
// map the first state to 000 state and the second one to something orthogonal to it
// (as described in reference solution)
R1(-2.0 * PI() / 3.0, qs[1]);
R1(-4.0 * PI() / 3.0, qs[2]);
Adjoint WState_Arbitrary_Reference(qs);
// measure all qubits: if all of them are 0, we have the first state,
// if at least one of them is 1, we have the second state
return MeasureInteger(LittleEndian(qs)) == 0 ? 0 | 1;
}
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
// Part II*. Discriminating Nonorthogonal States
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
// Task 2.1*. |0⟩ or |+⟩ ?
// (quantum hypothesis testing or state discrimination with minimum error)
// Input: a qubit which is guaranteed to be in |0⟩ or |+⟩ state with equal probability.
// Output: true if qubit was in |0⟩ state, or false if it was in |+⟩ state.
// The state of the qubit at the end of the operation does not matter.
// Note: in this task you have to get accuracy of at least 80%.
operation IsQubitPlusOrZero_Reference (q : Qubit) : Bool {
// Let {E_a, E_b} be a measurement with two outcomes a and b, which we identify with
// the answers, i.e., "a" = "state was |0⟩" and "b = state was |+⟩". Then we define
// P(a|0) = probability to observe first outcome given that the state was |0⟩
// P(b|0) = probability to observe second outcome given that the state was |0⟩
// P(a|+) = probability to observe first outcome given that the state was |+⟩
// P(b|+) = probability to observe second outcome given that the state was |+⟩
// The task is to maximize the probability to be correct on a single shot experiment,
// which is the same as to minimize the probability to be wrong (on a single shot).
// Assuming uniform prior, i.e., P(+) = P(0) = 1/2, we get
// P_correct = P(0) P(a|0) + P(+) P(b|+) = 1/2 * (P(a|0) + P(b|+)).
// Assuming a von Neumann measurement of the form
// E_a = Ry(2*alpha) * (1,0) = (cos(alpha), sin(alpha)) and
// E_b = Ry(2*alpha) * (0,1) = (sin(alpha), -cos(alpha)), we get
// P(a|0) = |⟨E_a|0⟩|² = cos²(alpha),
// P(b|+) = |⟨E_b|+⟩|² = 1/2 + cos(alpha) sin(alpha), and
// P_correct = 1/2 * (1/2 + cos²(alpha) + cos(alpha) sin(alpha)).
// Maximizing this for alpha, we get max P_success = 1/2 (1 + 1/sqrt(2)) = 0.8535...,
// which is attained for alpha = π/8.
// Rotate the input state by π/8 means to apply Ry with angle 2π/8.
Ry(0.25 * PI(), q);
return M(q) == Zero;
}
// Task 2.2**. |0⟩, |+⟩ or inconclusive?
// (unambiguous state discrimination)
// Input: a qubit which is guaranteed to be in |0⟩ or |+⟩ state with equal probability.
// Output: 0 if qubit was in |0⟩ state,
// 1 if it was in |+⟩ state,
// -1 if you can't decide, i.e., an "inconclusive" result.
// Your solution:
// - can never give 0 or 1 answer incorrectly (i.e., identify |0⟩ as 1 or |+⟩ as 0).
// - must give inconclusive (-1) answer at most 80% of the times.
// - must correctly identify |0⟩ state as 0 at least 10% of the times.
// - must correctly identify |+⟩ state as 1 at least 10% of the times.
//
// The state of the qubit at the end of the operation does not matter.
// You are allowed to use ancilla qubit(s).
operation IsQubitPlusZeroOrInconclusiveSimpleUSD_Reference (q : Qubit) : Int {
// A simple strategy that gives an inconclusive result with probability 0.75
// and never errs in case it yields a conclusive result can be obtained from
// randomizing the choice of measurement basis between the computational basis (std)
// and the Hadamard basis (had). Observe that when measured in the standard basis,
// the state |0⟩ will always lead to the outcome "0", whereas the state |+⟩
// will lead to outcomes "0" respectively "1" with probability 1/2. This means
// that upon measuring "1" we can with certainty conclude that the state was |+⟩.
// A similar argument applies to the scenario where we measure in the Hadamard
// basis, where |0⟩ can lead to both outcomes, whereas |+⟩ always leads to "0".
// Then upon measuring "1" we can with certainty conclude that the state was |0⟩.
//
// This leads to the following scenarios (shown are the conditional probabilities
// of the above scenarios and resulting answers).
// state | basis | output 0 | output 1 | output -1
// -----------------------------------------------
// |0⟩ | std | 0 | 0 | 1
// |+⟩ | std | 0 | 1/2 | 1/2
// |0⟩ | had | 1/2 | 0 | 1/2
// |+⟩ | had | 0 | 0 | 1
let basis = DrawRandomInt(0, 1);
// randomize over std and had
if (basis == 0) {
// use standard basis
let result = M(q);
// result is One only if the state was |+⟩
return result == One ? 1 | -1;
}
else {
// use Hadamard basis
H(q);
let result = M(q);
// result is One only if the state was |0⟩
return result == One ? 0 | -1;
}
}
// Task 2.3**. Unambiguous state discrimination of 3 non-orthogonal states on one qubit
// (a.k.a. the Peres/Wootters game)
// Input: a qubit which is guaranteed to be in one of the three states with equal probability:
// |A⟩ = 1/sqrt(2) (|0⟩ + |1⟩),
// |B⟩ = 1/sqrt(2) (|0⟩ + ω |1⟩),
// |C⟩ = 1/sqrt(2) (|0⟩ + ω² |1⟩).
// where ω = exp(2π/3) denotes a primitive, complex 3rd root of unity.
// Output: 1 or 2 if qubit was in the |A⟩ state,
// 0 or 2 if qubit was in the |B⟩ state,
// 0 or 1 if qubit was in the |C⟩ state.
// The state of the qubit at the end of the operation does not matter.
// Note: in this task you have to succeed with probability 1, i.e., your are never allowed
// to give an incorrect answer.
operation IsQubitNotInABC_Reference (q : Qubit) : Int {
// The key is the observation that the POVM with rank one elements {E_0, E_1, E_2} will do
// the job, where E_k = |psi_k><psi_k| and |psi_k⟩ = 1/sqrt(2)(|0⟩-ω^k |1⟩) and where
// k = 0, 1, 2. The remaining task will be to find a von Neumann measurement (on a qubit
// system) that implements said POVM by means of a quantum circuit. To obtain such a
// quantum circuit, we observe that all we need is a unitary extension of the matrix
// formed by A = (psi_0, psi_1, psi_2). In general, such a unitary extension can be
// found using a Singular Value Decomposition of the matrix. Here we can apply a short cut:
// The matrix A can be extended (up to a +1/-1 diagonal) to a 3x3 Discrete Fourier Transform.
// Padded with 1 extra dimension (i.e., a 1x1 block in which we have phase freedom), we obtain
// a 4x4 unitary. Using the "Rader trick" we can now block decompose the 3x3 DFT and obtain two
// 2x2 blocks which we can then implement using controlled single qubit gates. We present
// the final resulting circuit without additional commentary.
let alpha = ArcCos(Sqrt(2.0 / 3.0));
use a = Qubit();
Z(q);
CNOT(a, q);
Controlled H([q], a);
S(a);
X(q);
(ControlledOnInt(0, Ry))([a], (-2.0 * alpha, q));
CNOT(a, q);
Controlled H([q], a);
CNOT(a, q);
// finally, measure in the standard basis
let res0 = MResetZ(a);
let res1 = M(q);
// dispatch on the cases
if (res0 == Zero and res1 == Zero) {
return 0;
}
elif (res0 == One and res1 == Zero) {
return 1;
}
elif (res0 == Zero and res1 == One) {
return 2;
}
else {
// this should never occur
return 3;
}
}
}