Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Research of existing voting systems designs #3

Open
roleengineer opened this issue Apr 6, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Research of existing voting systems designs #3

roleengineer opened this issue Apr 6, 2022 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
Bounty Size M 350 to 550 / DAI

Comments

@roleengineer
Copy link
Collaborator

⚡️ Challenge:

We have implemented some voting design while coding treasury. It's time to look around and see what other devs have done in terms of voting systems.

🦋 Desired Outcome

  • have strong picture of different voting system implementations;
  • pros and cons of existing implementations vs our current design
  • answer on the question: "should our current design be completely/partly/minor refactored?"

🎯 Action Points:

  • take few popular and few unpopular existing voting system implementations
  • dive deeper into used approaches, structures and code
  • ask weird question in projects socials (if something bad or interesting was found)
  • end with opinion about current voting system design

🏆 Reward + Contributor involved

This bounty can be a pair programming bounty:

Bounty Size: M
550 DAI

Gardener - @roleengineer 0%
Worker - @roleengineer 80%
Reviewer - tbd 20%

@roleengineer roleengineer self-assigned this Apr 6, 2022
@roleengineer roleengineer added the Bounty Size M 350 to 550 / DAI label Apr 6, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Bounty Size M 350 to 550 / DAI
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant